VS

Ford Ranger vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Ford Ranger vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • barely more power
  • a bit more efficient
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • noticeably more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Ranger

Ford Ranger vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: A Battle of Utility vs. Luxury

When it comes to choosing a new vehicle, potential buyers often find themselves weighing the pros and cons of different models that serve distinct purposes. Today, we pit two popular models against each other: the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This comparison highlights the technical aspects and innovations that set these vehicles apart in the competitive automotive market.

Range Rover Evoque

Power and Performance

The Ford Ranger stands out as a robust pickup, offering a range of engines from as low as 170 HP to a mighty 292 HP. This diversity is powered by either diesel or petrol engines, with options for either manual or automatic transmissions. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies between 7.9 to 12.1 seconds, and the Ranger can reach a top speed of 190 km/h.

On the other hand, the Range Rover Evoque holds its ground as a luxury SUV with engines ranging from 160 HP to 269 HP. Notably, it offers plug-in hybrid options, leading to impressive fuel efficiencies as low as 1.4 L/100km with an all-electric range of 68 km. Its acceleration ranges from 7.2 to 10.3 seconds to reach 100 km/h, topping out at 213 km/h. The Evoque provides a blend of elegance and functionality, making it an impressive option for urban and off-road adventures alike.

Ranger

Dimensions and Capacity

The Ford Ranger is designed for heavy-duty tasks, measuring in length from 5370 mm to 5420 mm. With a payload capacity of up to 1108 kg, this vehicle is built for work, sporting a generous cargo bay while offering seating for up to five passengers.

Conversely, the Range Rover Evoque, at a length of 4371 mm, focuses on delivering a compact SUV experience. Its payload hovers around 600 kg, with a trunk space of 472 liters, which is ample for most journeys. This model ensures that luxury remains at the forefront thanks to its refined design and practical interior space.

Range Rover Evoque

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

In terms of fuel consumption, the Ranger's diesel engines range from 8.4 to 13.8 L/100km, which is expected for a pickup with its capabilities. CO2 emissions range from 220 to 315 g/km, placing it in efficiency class G.

The Evoque, especially in its plug-in hybrid version, shines with an impressive 1.4 L/100km consumption rate, emitting as little as 31 g/km of CO2, achieving a CO2 efficiency class of B. This makes the Evoque an environmentally friendlier option for drivers focused on reducing their carbon footprint.

Innovations and Features

Ford Ranger has been a favorite for those who value rugged reliability and off-road prowess. Its all-wheel drive capabilities and high torque output (reaching up to 600 Nm) make it a competent companion for any terrain.

The Range Rover Evoque, meanwhile, features Multi-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) technology, delivering an intelligent balance of fuel economy and performance. It includes cutting-edge features such as adaptive cruise control and terrain response technology, showcasing Land Rover's dedication to luxury and innovation.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque ultimately boils down to intended use and personal preference. The Ford Ranger emerges as the ideal choice for those seeking a powerful workhorse with significant towing and payload capabilities. In contrast, the Range Rover Evoque appeals to individuals desiring a stylish, eco-friendly SUV packed with advanced features for both city driving and light off-road excursions.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is somewhat cheaper – starting at 43,300 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,154 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 67 km, about 25 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers barely more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers noticeably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 157 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is noticeably lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 613 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries visibly more – 989 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 389 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.