Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (281 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Skoda Superb Combi?
Ford Ranger vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Superb Combi is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,100 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,354 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Combi offers considerably more range – reaching up to 137 km, about 95 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers marginally more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 297 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is substantially lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 830 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries substantially more – 989 kg compared to 584 kg. That’s a difference of about 405 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Combi is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,100
Skoda Superb Combi
Ford Ranger
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Ford Ranger
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.