Compare performance (292 HP vs 169 HP), boot space and price (45600 £ vs 37200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Subaru Outback?
In the automotive world, versatility and performance are valued attributes, especially when comparing two iconic models like the Ford Ranger and the Subaru Outback. Both vehicles have carved out strong niches in the market, yet they cater to slightly different kinds of riders. Here, we delve into their technical aspects and innovative features to see what sets them apart.
The Ford Ranger is designed as a robust pickup truck, appealing to those who need a reliable workhorse on and off the road. Its commanding presence is defined by its length, ranging from 5370mm to 5420mm, and it stands tall at heights between 1868mm and 1922mm, complemented by a width up to 1968mm.
Contrastingly, the Subaru Outback serves as a wagon, favored for its balance between practical daily driving and adventurous excursions. Sleek and stylish, the Outback measures a length of 4870mm with a height of up to 1675mm, making it slightly more compact compared to the Ranger, offering easier maneuverability in urban settings.
Diversification in engine choices gives the Ranger a broad appeal. It offers both diesel and petrol engines, with power outputs ranging from 170 HP to 292 HP. This robust power is matched by torque figures as high as 600 Nm. Despite its power orientation, fuel consumption ranges from 8.4 to 13.8 L/100km, depending on engine choice, which can impact fuel economy.
Meanwhile, the Outback sticks to a petrol engine, delivering 169 HP with a torque of 252 Nm. Its smoother CVT transmission aids in maintaining an 8.6 L/100km consumption rate, making it more fuel-efficient for longer trips while still bringing ample power to the driving experience.
Both vehicles proudly feature All-Wheel Drive (AWD) systems, promising enhanced traction and stability. The Ranger, with its pickup design, excels in off-road capabilities, being well-suited for rough terrains and challenging conditions. Its payload capacity varies extensively, maxing out at 1108 kg, a testament to its practical utility.
Subaru's Outback appeals more to those needing reliable performance on light off-road tracks, everyday roads, and in varied weather conditions. Its trunk capacity of 561 L assures generous space for both adventure gear and daily necessities.
The Ford Ranger offers configurations with up to 5 seats, focusing on combining utility and comfort in its cabin layout, which can similarly host two or four doors based on variant preference.
The Outback, on the other hand, accommodates 5 passengers across the board with a strong emphasis on comfort and convenience, accessible through its five-door setup.
Both vehicles fall into the CO2 Efficiency Class G, reflecting their performance engines. For eco-conscious drivers, it's essential to note the variable CO2 emissions, with the Ranger ranging up to 315 g/km compared to the Outback's 193 g/km.
Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Subaru Outback largely depends on your lifestyle needs. If a powerful, rugged workhorse with diverse configurations is what you seek, the Ranger is unrivaled. However, for those inclined towards a versatile, comfortable, and fuel-efficient ride perfect for both city streets and camping getaways, the Outback stands as a superb choice. Either way, both vehicles represent formidable engineering with a focus on reliability and performance.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Subaru Outback has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37200 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 45600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8349 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Subaru Outback with 8.60 L. The difference is about 5.50 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a convincingly edge – offering 292 HP compared to 169 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Subaru Outback takes 10.20 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Subaru Outback performs slight better – reaching 193 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls significantly stronger with 697 Nm compared to 252 Nm. That’s about 445 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Subaru Outback is clearly lighter – 1643 kg compared to 2405 kg. The difference is around 762 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger convincingly takes the win – 989 kg compared to 557 kg. That’s a difference of about 432 kg.
The Ford Ranger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
The Subaru Outback is the do-it-all wagon for buyers who want SUV capability without the SUV bulk, blending rugged confidence with everyday civility. It's practical, dependable, and built to shrug off rough gravel tracks or rainy commutes with a grin — ideal for buyers who actually use their vehicles, not just park them for show.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45600 - 71900 £
|
Price
37200 - 41600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
8.60 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
193 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
63 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2405 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
1643 - 1676 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
561 L
|
|
Length
5370 - 5381 mm
|
Length
4870 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
1875 mm
|
|
Height
1884 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1670 - 1675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1822 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 989 kg
|
Payload
524 - 557 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
169 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.20 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
193 km/h
|
|
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
252 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Subaru
|
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España