Compare performance (292 HP vs 169 HP), boot space and price (45,600 £ vs 40,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Subaru Outback?
In the automotive world, versatility and performance are valued attributes, especially when comparing two iconic models like the Ford Ranger and the Subaru Outback. Both vehicles have carved out strong niches in the market, yet they cater to slightly different kinds of riders. Here, we delve into their technical aspects and innovative features to see what sets them apart.
The Ford Ranger is designed as a robust pickup truck, appealing to those who need a reliable workhorse on and off the road. Its commanding presence is defined by its length, ranging from 5370mm to 5420mm, and it stands tall at heights between 1868mm and 1922mm, complemented by a width up to 1968mm.
Contrastingly, the Subaru Outback serves as a wagon, favored for its balance between practical daily driving and adventurous excursions. Sleek and stylish, the Outback measures a length of 4870mm with a height of up to 1675mm, making it slightly more compact compared to the Ranger, offering easier maneuverability in urban settings.
Diversification in engine choices gives the Ranger a broad appeal. It offers both diesel and petrol engines, with power outputs ranging from 170 HP to 292 HP. This robust power is matched by torque figures as high as 600 Nm. Despite its power orientation, fuel consumption ranges from 8.4 to 13.8 L/100km, depending on engine choice, which can impact fuel economy.
Meanwhile, the Outback sticks to a petrol engine, delivering 169 HP with a torque of 252 Nm. Its smoother CVT transmission aids in maintaining an 8.6 L/100km consumption rate, making it more fuel-efficient for longer trips while still bringing ample power to the driving experience.
Both vehicles proudly feature All-Wheel Drive (AWD) systems, promising enhanced traction and stability. The Ranger, with its pickup design, excels in off-road capabilities, being well-suited for rough terrains and challenging conditions. Its payload capacity varies extensively, maxing out at 1108 kg, a testament to its practical utility.
Subaru's Outback appeals more to those needing reliable performance on light off-road tracks, everyday roads, and in varied weather conditions. Its trunk capacity of 561 L assures generous space for both adventure gear and daily necessities.
The Ford Ranger offers configurations with up to 5 seats, focusing on combining utility and comfort in its cabin layout, which can similarly host two or four doors based on variant preference.
The Outback, on the other hand, accommodates 5 passengers across the board with a strong emphasis on comfort and convenience, accessible through its five-door setup.
Both vehicles fall into the CO2 Efficiency Class G, reflecting their performance engines. For eco-conscious drivers, it's essential to note the variable CO2 emissions, with the Ranger ranging up to 315 g/km compared to the Outback's 193 g/km.
Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Subaru Outback largely depends on your lifestyle needs. If a powerful, rugged workhorse with diverse configurations is what you seek, the Ranger is unrivaled. However, for those inclined towards a versatile, comfortable, and fuel-efficient ride perfect for both city streets and camping getaways, the Outback stands as a superb choice. Either way, both vehicles represent formidable engineering with a focus on reliability and performance.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Subaru Outback is somewhat cheaper – starting at 40,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 45,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,563 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Subaru Outback with 8.6 L/100km. The difference is about 5.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 169 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Subaru Outback takes 10.2 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 252 Nm. That’s about 445 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Subaru Outback is considerably lighter – 1,643 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 762 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries substantially more – 989 kg compared to 557 kg. That’s a difference of about 432 kg.
The Ford Ranger stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
The Subaru Outback is the do-it-all wagon for buyers who want SUV capability without the SUV bulk, blending rugged confidence with everyday civility. It's practical, dependable, and built to shrug off rough gravel tracks or rainy commutes with a grin — ideal for buyers who actually use their vehicles, not just park them for show.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
|
Price
40,000 - 44,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
193 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,643 - 1,676 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
561 L
|
|
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
676 - 989 kg
|
Payload
524 - 557 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
169 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
252 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Subaru
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España