@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
VS

Ford Ranger vs Honda CR-V - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (292 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (37500 £ vs 42800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Honda CR-V?

Ford Ranger

Honda CR-V

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Ranger has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £, while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5246 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 0.90 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.10 L. The difference is about 2.20 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Honda CR-V performs significantly better – achieving up to 79 km, about 37 km more than the Ford Ranger.

CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a noticeable edge – offering 292 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Honda CR-V performs barely noticeable better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls convincingly stronger with 697 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 362 Nm difference.

Ranger @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Honda CR-V is to a small extent lighter – 1821 kg compared to 2082 kg. The difference is around 261 kg.

When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger convincingly takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 633 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Honda CR-V shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £42,800
CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 - 6.7 L
  • Electric Range : 79 km
Ford Ranger
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Honda CR-V

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
Ford Ranger
Honda CR-V
Ranger @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Costs and Consumption

Price
37500 - 71900 £
Price
42800 - 52100 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
19 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 57 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
2 - 4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
Length
4706 mm
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
Width
1866 mm
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
Height
1673 - 1684 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1634 - 1710 L
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 195 km/h
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
Engine capacity
1993 cm3

General

Model Year
2022 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Honda
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.