@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-60 – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Honda CR-V or Mazda CX-60?

CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

SUV Showdown: Honda CR-V vs. Mazda CX-60

As SUVs continue to conquer the automotive market with their blend of practicality and performance, two models stand out for the 2024 season: the Honda CR-V and the Mazda CX-60. Both vehicles are equipped with advanced features and innovative technology, catering to the tastes of discerning drivers. But how do these two SUVs stack up against each other? Let’s delve into the intricacies of their design, performance, and technology.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Performance and Engine Options

The Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 offer a variety of engine choices, catering to different driving styles and preferences. The Honda CR-V comes with either a full hybrid or a plug-in hybrid engine. Its engine has a power output of 135 kW (184 HP), with a torque of 335 Nm. Performance-wise, it completes the 0-100 km/h dash in 9.5 seconds and boasts a top speed of 194 km/h. With a consumption of 6 L/100 km and an electric range extending up to 79 km, the CR-V combines efficiency with practicality.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 offers a stronger punch with its engine options, including a plug-in hybrid and a diesel mild hybrid. The most powerful variant delivers 327 HP (241 kW) and a hefty torque of 550 Nm. Notably quicker off the line, the CX-60 reaches 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds and pushes up to a maximum speed of 219 km/h. With fuel consumption as low as 1.4 L/100 km, the CX-60 also offers impressive efficiency, but its electric range is slightly less at 64 km.

CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Transmission and Drive Type

Both SUVs come equipped with automatic transmission systems designed for smooth and effortless driving. The Honda CR-V features a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), available in all-wheel drive and front-wheel drive configurations, providing flexibility depending on driving needs.

The Mazda CX-60, on the other hand, uses a conventional automatic gearbox and offers both all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive options. This flexibility allows drivers to tailor their driving experience, whether they prioritize traction or enjoy a more performance-oriented feel with rear-wheel drive.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Design Dimensions and Capacity

In terms of dimensions, the Honda CR-V measures 4706 mm in length, 1866 mm in width, and up to 1684 mm in height. It offers a substantial trunk capacity ranging from 579 to 617 liters, ensuring adequate space for family travels or grocery hauls.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-60 is slightly larger, measuring 4745 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and up to 1688 mm in height. It offers a trunk capacity of 570 liters, which, while slightly less than the CR-V’s maximum, is still ample for most needs.

CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Weight and Payload

Weight is an essential factor for driving dynamics and fuel efficiency. The CR-V’s curb weight ranges from 1821 to 1988 kg, and it supports a payload capacity between 439 to 475 kg. In comparison, the Mazda CX-60 weighs in between 1890 to 2055 kg, with an impressive payload capacity of up to 612 kg, allowing it to handle heavier loads with ease.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Environmental Impact

The CO2 efficiency of both vehicles reflects their commitment to reducing environmental impact. The Honda CR-V is efficient, with emissions ranging from 18 to 152 g/km, depending on the model specification, and it falls within CO2 efficiency classes B to E.

The Mazda CX-60 exhibits exceptional environmental performance in its plug-in hybrid configuration, boasting as low as 31 g/km of CO2 emissions and classification in efficiency classes B and D.

CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Final Verdict

When comparing the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60, prospective buyers face a tough choice between these high-performance SUVs. The CR-V promises reliable efficiency, practicality, and a more conservative yet contemporary design. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out for its performance, luxury appeal, and exceptional payload capacity, all wrapped in a stylish package.

Ultimately, whether you choose the practical efficiency of the Honda CR-V or the high-octane charm of the Mazda CX-60, both models promise an elevated driving experience matched with innovative technology.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 866 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 0.90 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Honda CR-V performs somewhat better – achieving up to 79 km, about 15 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a clearly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs a bit better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Honda CR-V tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Honda CR-V is slight lighter – 1821 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers barely noticeable more room – 617 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs slight better – up to 1726 L, which is about 16 L more than the Honda CR-V.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £41,900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Honda CR-V

5 (1)
rate

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015 @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
42220_CR-V_2015 @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
42219_CR-V_2015 @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
42241_CR-V_2015 @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
42800 - 52100 £
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
64 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
19 - 152 g/km
co2
31 - 139 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 57 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4706 mm
Length
4745 mm
Width
1866 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1673 - 1684 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Max trunk capacity
1634 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
187 - 195 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Honda
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
MG HS/EHS
VS
Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the MG HS/EHS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
Honda CR-V and Kia Sportage go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the Nissan Qashqai is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drivetrain options does the Honda CR-V have?

The Honda CR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.