Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Honda CR-V comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Honda CR-V?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Honda CR-V: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,858 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Honda CR-V with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers visibly more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 41 km more than the Honda CR-V.
CR-V
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers moderately more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Connect delivers marginally more torque with 350 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is slightly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers considerably more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 617 L. That’s a difference of about 1,103 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries substantially more – 818 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 343 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Honda CR-V
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Honda CR-V
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Honda CR-V
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
78 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
59 - 152 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,866 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.