VS

Ford Tourneo Courier vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Courier or Mazda CX-5?

Ford Tourneo Courier vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Ford Tourneo Courier

  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tourneo Courier

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Tourneo Courier is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,177 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Courier uses 6.6 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers marginally more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Courier delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 52 Nm more.

Tourneo Courier

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Courier is only slightly lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 112 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers somewhat more boot space – 570 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries moderately more – 601 kg compared to 483 kg. That’s a difference of about 118 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Tourneo Courier stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,800
Tourneo Courier

Ford Tourneo Courier

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 320 km
Ford Tourneo Courier
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Tourneo Courier

The Ford Tourneo Courier is a cheeky, compact people carrier that turns urban errands into a pleasure, thanks to a spacious, cleverly packaged cabin and genuinely practical storage everywhere you look. It drives with reassuringly car-like manners, so the ride is comfy for school runs and shopping trips, and sensible touches like fold-flat seats, a high driving position and plentiful cubbies make it a smart, fuss-free choice for small families and weekend haulers.

details

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
Ford Tourneo Courier
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,800 - 35,000 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
320 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 151 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,545 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 - 1,813 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
480 - 483 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 136 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 100 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.