Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-5 or VW T-Roc fits your lifestyle better.
In the fiercely competitive world of SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and the VW T-Roc constantly vie for the spotlight, each bringing its own unique blend of design, performance, and innovation. As consumers demand more from their vehicles, these two contenders make a compelling case. Let's dive into the details that set them apart and define their appeal.
Both the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc are designed to impress. The CX-5, with a body length of 4575 mm, width of 1845 mm, and height of 1680 mm, commands a strong presence on the road. Its aesthetic is characterized by sleek lines and a bolder silhouette.
The T-Roc, slightly more compact, measures up at 4236 mm to 4271 mm in length, with a width ranging from 1811 mm to 1819 mm and a height of 1527 mm to 1584 mm. This makes it a more agile companion for urban settings, yet it doesn't skimp on the dashing charm VW is known for.
The Mazda CX-5 offers a range of petrol MHEV and diesel engines, boasting power outputs between 150 and 194 HP, distributed via either manual or automatic transmissions. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies between 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, reflecting diverse performance options tailored to different driving styles.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc offers petrol and diesel engines with power spread from 115 to 300 HP. Notably, it includes the high-performance 300 HP variant. The T-Roc caters to performance enthusiasts with a striking acceleration of 6.8 seconds to a blistering 4.9 seconds for 0 to 100 km/h, and a top speed reaching 250 km/h.
Efficiency is key, with the CX-5 showing fuel consumption ranging from 5.6 to 7.6 L/100 km, while emitting CO2 between 146 and 173 g/km. The T-Roc competes closely, with fuel consumption between 4.7 and 8.5 L/100 km, and CO2 emissions spanning 125 to 194 g/km.
For families and adventurers alike, space is a crucial factor. The CX-5 presents itself with a trunk capacity of 510 to 522 liters, ensuring ample room for weekend getaways or daily errands. Its seating capacity comfortably accommodates five, making it an ideal choice for family ventures.
The T-Roc, offering seating for four to five and a trunk size varying from 284 to 445 liters, is slightly more limited in storage yet perfect for those who value a compact yet capable SUV.
When it comes to technical innovations, both vehicles are well-equipped. The Mazda CX-5 is a testament to sleek integration of safety and entertainment tech, emphasizing a driver-centric cockpit. The VW T-Roc, known for its tech-savvy interior, incorporates the latest in connectivity and digital instrumentation, ensuring drivers are always in control and informed.
The Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc both have their strengths and cater to slightly different market niches. Whether it's the rugged, spacious integrity of the CX-5 or the sporty, dynamic appeal of the T-Roc, both SUVs stand out in their versatility and innovation. The choice ultimately depends on your lifestyle needs and driving preferences. As SUVs continue to captivate a global audience, these models are proof that great things indeed come in stylish, powerful packages.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW T-Roc has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 3562 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Roc manages with 5.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 150 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs slight better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 17 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW T-Roc is somewhat lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 164 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers slightly more room – 583 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 108 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2019 L, which is about 669 L more than the VW T-Roc.
The VW T-Roc proves to be won narrowly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW T-Roc is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30000 - 39500 £
|
Price
26400 - 38000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
|
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
583 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
|
|
Length
4690 mm
|
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
|
|
Height
1695 mm
|
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
VW
|
The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España