VS

Ford Tourneo Custom vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (286 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (52,900 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Custom or Mazda CX-80?

Ford Tourneo Custom vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Ford Tourneo Custom

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more electric range
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tourneo Custom

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is barely cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Custom costs 52,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,559 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers considerably more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 279 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 286 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Custom delivers moderately more torque with 630 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Tourneo Custom

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Tourneo Custom offers more seats – 8 vs 7.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is noticeably lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 529 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers considerably more boot space – 819 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 561 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Custom carries very slightly more – 690 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Tourneo Custom holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £52,900
Tourneo Custom

Ford Tourneo Custom

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 218 - 286 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 24.1 - 26.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 310 - 339 km
Ford Tourneo Custom
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Tourneo Custom

The Ford Tourneo Custom is a practical and polished people‑carrier that turns hauling crew and weekend kit into something surprisingly pleasant, with a composed ride and a cabin built for real life rather than showroom gloss. With clever storage, flexible seating and tech that keeps everyone happy on the road, it’s the sensible choice for families or businesses that want function without sacrificing a bit of style — the van that learnt how to be nice to live with.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
Ford Tourneo Custom
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
52,900 - 69,700 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
24.1 - 26.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
310 - 339 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
8
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,660 - 2,707 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
672 - 819 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,032 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
620 - 690 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 - 286 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
160 - 210 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.