Compare performance (286 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (45,700 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Custom or Mercedes EQT?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Custom costs 45,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,973 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQT is clearly more efficient: consuming 19.5 kWh/100km compared to 24.1 kWh/100km for the Ford Tourneo Custom. That’s a difference of about 4.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers moderately more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 61 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers clearly more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 164 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Custom delivers significantly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 385 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Tourneo Custom offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is clearly lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,453 kg. The difference is around 528 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers visibly more boot space – 819 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,979 L, about 625 L more than the Ford Tourneo Custom.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Custom carries clearly more – 847 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 316 kg.
The Ford Tourneo Custom is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Tourneo Custom is a practical and polished people‑carrier that turns hauling crew and weekend kit into something surprisingly pleasant, with a composed ride and a cabin built for real life rather than showroom gloss. With clever storage, flexible seating and tech that keeps everyone happy on the road, it’s the sensible choice for families or businesses that want function without sacrificing a bit of style — the van that learnt how to be nice to live with.
detailsThe Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,700 - 69,700 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24.1 - 26.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
49 - 339 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 226 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 63 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
8
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,453 - 2,707 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
672 - 819 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,958 - 1,959 mm
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,045 - 1,354 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
620 - 847 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
360 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, C, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|