Compare performance (150 HP vs 228 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Mercedes EQA?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes EQA is a bit cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,626 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers noticeably more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.
Both models offer the same torque – 390 Nm.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQA is a bit lighter – 2,115 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 223 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQA offers clearly more boot space – 340 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries clearly more – 1,162 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 737 kg.
The Mercedes EQA stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
476 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
2,115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
390 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
168 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|