Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Transit Connect vs Nissan Interstar – Which one offers the better deal?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Transit Connect or Nissan Interstar?
Transit Connect
@ media.ford.com
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Connect has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26700 £, while the Nissan Interstar costs 34900 £. That’s a price difference of around 8211 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Transit Connect manages with 0.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.40 L. The difference is about 6.90 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Nissan Interstar performs significantly better – achieving up to 410 km, about 292 km more than the Ford Transit Connect.
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar has a a bit edge – offering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Transit Connect performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Nissan Interstar tops out at 177 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Interstar pulls slight stronger with 380 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Interstar offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is clearly perceptible lighter – 1477 kg compared to 2053 kg. The difference is around 576 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Interstar performs decisively better – up to 14800 L, which is about 11100 L more than the Ford Transit Connect.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Interstar decisively takes the win – 1447 kg compared to 792 kg. That’s a difference of about 655 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Transit Connect shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £26,700
Ford Transit Connect
Ford Transit Connect
The Ford Transit Connect is a versatile compact van that seamlessly combines functionality with a comfortable driving experience. Its spacious interior is designed to accommodate both passengers and cargo, making it an ideal choice for small businesses and active families alike. With its efficient engine and agile handling, the Transit Connect offers a reliable and economical option for urban and suburban driving.
details
@ media.ford.com
@ media.ford.com
@ media.ford.com
Nissan Interstar
The Nissan Interstar is a versatile van that expertly combines practicality with modern design. It offers a spacious interior that caters to both cargo and passenger needs, making it ideal for businesses and families alike. With its robust performance and efficient fuel consumption, the Interstar stands out as a reliable choice in the commercial vehicle market.
details
Ford Transit Connect
Nissan Interstar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26700 - 41500 £
|
Price
34900 - 55700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 153 g/km
|
co2
0 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
3 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1477 - 1866 kg
|
Curb weight
2053 - 2535 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4500 - 4868 mm
|
Length
5680 - 6315 mm
|
|
Width
1855 mm
|
Width
2080 mm
|
|
Height
1856 - 1860 mm
|
Height
2498 - 2756 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2500 - 3700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
5200 - 14800 L
|
|
Payload
602 - 792 kg
|
Payload
965 - 1447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
|
|
Torque
280 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Transit Connect?
The Ford Transit Connect is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.