Compare performance (150 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (26,700 £ vs 34,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Nissan Interstar?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Transit Connect is markedly cheaper – starting at 26,700 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 34,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,211 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Transit Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 6.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers considerably more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 292 km more than the Ford Transit Connect.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Ford Transit Connect is very slightly faster – reaching 186 km/h, while the Nissan Interstar tops out at 177 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers very slightly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is markedly lighter – 1,477 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 576 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Interstar offers clearly more capacity – up to 13,000 L, about 9,300 L more than the Ford Transit Connect.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 792 kg. That’s a difference of about 655 kg.
The Ford Transit Connect is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,700 - 41,500 £
|
Price
34,900 - 55,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 153 g/km
|
co2
0 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
3 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,477 - 1,866 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,535 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,500 - 4,868 mm
|
Length
5,685 - 6,315 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
1,856 - 1,860 mm
|
Height
2,498 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
10,800 - 13,000 L
|
|
Payload
602 - 792 kg
|
Payload
965 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
|
|
Torque
280 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|