Compare performance (122 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Suzuki Swift?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Swift is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,662 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Connect offers clearly more power – delivering 122 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers clearly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 208 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Suzuki Swift offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is clearly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 506 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries substantially more – 780 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 484 kg.
The Ford Transit Connect is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
-
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|