VS

Ford Transit Courier vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Courier or MG ZS?

Ford Transit Courier vs MG ZS: Key differences

Ford Transit Courier

details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Courier

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is moderately cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Courier costs 20,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,664 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Ford Transit Courier with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Courier delivers significantly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

Transit Courier

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,378 kg. The difference is around 48 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Courier carries noticeably more – 701 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 231 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Transit Courier is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,700
Transit Courier

Ford Transit Courier

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 325 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
Ford Transit Courier
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Courier

The Ford Transit Courier is a compact, city-friendly van that hides surprising practicality behind a neat, no-nonsense exterior. Ideal for small businesses and urban runs, it pairs easy maneuverability and clever load solutions with a colleague-friendly driving position — proof that you don't need a giant van to get big jobs done.

details
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12

Reviews Ford Transit Courier

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Jeep Avenger
MG ZS
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the MG ZS both aim at buyers wanting a small, practical SUV but take very different approaches. The Avenger is a compact, city-friendly Jeep with an electric drivetrain and rugged styling, while the MG ZS is a budget-focused small SUV offering spacious practicality and a choice …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
Opel Mokka
VS
Choosing between the MG ZS and the Opel Mokka comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward value and practicality or sharper styling and a more refined driving feel. Below I’ll compare their space, equipment, running costs and driving dynamics so you can pick the compact SUV that best …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Peugeot 2008 helps you weigh a value-focused, roomy compact SUV against a more stylish, composed rival with sharper handling and premium touches. This short guide highlights differences in space, equipment, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that …
Honda HR-V
MG ZS
VS
Honda HR‑V vs MG ZS — two popular small SUVs that aim at the same family and urban buyer, but take different approaches: the HR‑V focuses on refinement and long‑term dependability, while the MG ZS undercuts on price and packs in straight‑forward value. Below I compare the key points to help you …
Ford Transit Connect
Ford Transit Courier
VS
The Ford Transit Connect and the Ford Transit Courier are compact commercial vans that target slightly different needs: the Transit Connect offers more cargo space and flexibility for trades and small businesses, while the Courier is a smaller, more city-friendly option with lower running costs. …
Ford Transit Courier
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,700 - 31,900 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
325 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 158 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,378 - 1,549 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
529 - 701 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 136 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 100 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Ford Transit Courier have?

The Ford Transit Courier is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.