Compare performance (218 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Mitsubishi Space Star?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Bus costs 50,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,148 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Bus offers considerably more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers considerably more torque with 630 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 528 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|