Compare performance (269 HP vs 408 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or GWM ORA 07?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
GWM ORA 07 is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,318 £.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 07 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 118 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 07 offers noticeably more power – delivering 408 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 07 delivers markedly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The GWM ORA 07 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
36,000 - 45,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,210 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
333 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|