Compare performance (269 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 80,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Transit Transporter is moderately cheaper – starting at 67,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 80,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,833 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 284 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers considerably more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 281 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport delivers considerably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
80,100 - 129,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
60 - 259 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,809 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
2,043 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
641 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|