Compare performance (269 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (39900 £ vs 25700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Nissan Townstar?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Townstar has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14228 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Townstar manages with 6.70 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Nissan Townstar: with 19.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 21.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter performs evident better – achieving up to 402 km, about 121 km more than the Nissan Townstar.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a convincingly edge – offering 269 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Townstar performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 183 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Transporter pulls significantly stronger with 430 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Townstar offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.
In curb weight, Nissan Townstar is evident lighter – 1509 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 565 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs convincingly better – up to 14100 L, which is about 11050 L more than the Nissan Townstar.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter convincingly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 1966 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Nissan Townstar is a pragmatic city companion that blends clever packaging with a calm, easygoing drive, making it ideal for urban errands and small-business hauls. It won't win any style contests, but its tidy interior, sensible features and no-nonsense character make it a genuinely useful buy for people who value practicality over pizzazz.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39900 - 73000 £
|
Price
25700 - 37700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 281 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
|
Curb weight
1509 - 2041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 775 L
|
|
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
|
Length
4488 - 4911 mm
|
|
Width
2059 mm
|
Width
1859 - 1860 mm
|
|
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
|
Height
1838 - 1869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2800 - 3050 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
|
Payload
506 - 641 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2019 - 2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.