Compare performance (269 HP vs 195 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 29,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Peugeot 308?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 308 is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,200 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,072 £.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 308 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 450 km, about 48 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 195 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Peugeot 308 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Peugeot 308 brings a sleek, feline profile and an unexpectedly upscale cabin, with clever packaging and materials that feel a touch more premium than you might expect. It’s composed on the road, easy to live with for daily life, and a smart choice if you want a stylish hatch that still behaves when the road gets interesting.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
29,200 - 42,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
81 - 450 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,453 - 1,749 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
314 - 412 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
430 - 503 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|