Compare performance (269 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Scénic?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Scénic is significantly cheaper – starting at 34,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,681 £.
As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers markedly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 196 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers a bit more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 430 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Renault Scénic comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Renault Scenic is a practical and comfortable family car that prioritises interior flexibility and everyday usability. With a composed ride and clever storage solutions, it suits buyers who want a versatile, easy-to-live-with vehicle for family duties and daily driving.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,470 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|