Compare performance (269 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or SEAT Arona?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
SEAT Arona is significantly cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,609 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 119 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers significantly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe SEAT Arona is a compact crossover that blends practical, city-friendly packaging with a sporty, youthful design. It delivers a comfortable ride, an intuitive cabin and economical running costs, making it a sensible pick for daily drives and weekend getaways.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
20,700 - 30,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,188 - 1,268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,780 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
502 - 522 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SEAT
|