Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether GWM ORA 03 or MINI Aceman fits your lifestyle better.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £, while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33400 £. That’s a price difference of around 7963 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the GWM ORA 03 with 16.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.50 kWh.
As for range, the GWM ORA 03 performs minimal better – achieving up to 420 km, about 15 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 258 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.20 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the GWM ORA 03 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls distinct stronger with 350 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, GWM ORA 03 is slight lighter – 1615 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.
In terms of boot space, the MINI Aceman offers noticeable more room – 300 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.
In maximum load capacity, the MINI Aceman performs to a small extent better – up to 1005 L, which is about 147 L more than the GWM ORA 03.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman clearly perceptible takes the win – 530 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
The MINI Aceman proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MINI Aceman is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The GWM ORA 03 presents an intriguing fusion of retro design elements and modern technology, making it a standout in the current automotive landscape. Its distinctive aesthetic is matched by a surprisingly spacious interior, offering comfort and advanced infotainment features for a seamless driving experience. With a focus on sustainable mobility, this vehicle delivers impressive performance without compromising on efficiency, appealing to both environmentally conscious drivers and technology enthusiasts alike.
detailsThe MINI Aceman offers a fresh take on urban mobility, blending iconic design elements with modern technology. Its compact form is paired with an interior that exudes both comfort and style, making it a popular choice for city drivers. With an emphasis on sustainability, the Aceman features eco-friendly materials and innovative features that enhance the driving experience.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 42400 £
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45.4 - 59.3 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1615 - 1655 kg
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
4235 - 4254 mm
|
Length
4079 mm
|
|
Width
1825 - 1848 mm
|
Width
1754 mm
|
|
Height
1603 mm
|
Height
1514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
858 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
MINI
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.