Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 03 vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (171 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or MINI Aceman?
GWM ORA 03 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ORA 03
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman is markedly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,420 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the GWM ORA 03. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 03 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 65 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers clearly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers noticeably more torque with 350 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, GWM ORA 03 is only slightly lighter – 1,615 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MINI Aceman offers clearly more boot space – 300 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries markedly more – 530 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
GWM ORA 03
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
GWM ORA 03
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
GWM ORA 03
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.