Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 03 vs MINI Aceman - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (171 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (33400 £ vs 25500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or MINI Aceman?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7963 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the GWM ORA 03 with 16.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 03 performs minimal better – achieving up to 420 km, about 15 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 258 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.20 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the GWM ORA 03 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls distinct stronger with 350 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, GWM ORA 03 is slight lighter – 1615 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.
In terms of boot space, the MINI Aceman offers noticeable more room – 300 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.
In maximum load capacity, the MINI Aceman performs to a small extent better – up to 1005 L, which is about 147 L more than the GWM ORA 03.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman clearly perceptible takes the win – 530 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
GWM ORA 03
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,500
MINI Aceman
GWM ORA 03
4.7 (1 Reviews)
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
detailsMINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
GWM ORA 03
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 42400 £
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45.4 - 59.3 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1615 - 1655 kg
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
4235 - 4254 mm
|
Length
4079 mm
|
|
Width
1825 - 1848 mm
|
Width
1754 mm
|
|
Height
1603 mm
|
Height
1514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
858 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
MINI
|
What drivetrain options does the GWM ORA 03 have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.