Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs MINI Aceman - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 25500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or MINI Aceman?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MINI Aceman has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7714 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the MINI Aceman performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 405 km, about 25 km more than the Alpine A290.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a slightly edge – offering 258 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 6.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls somewhat stronger with 350 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is to a small extent lighter – 1554 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers barely noticeable more room – 326 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Alpine A290 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1106 L, which is about 101 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman evident takes the win – 530 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 134 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,500
MINI Aceman
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
MINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Alpine A290
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4079 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1754 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
MINI
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.