Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Tesla Model 3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (258 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Tesla Model 3?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the Tesla Model 3 costs 34300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8820 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the MINI Aceman with 14 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 performs convincingly better – achieving up to 750 km, about 345 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Model 3
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a decisively edge – offering 460 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 202 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs evident better – reaching 262 km/h, while the MINI Aceman tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 62 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model 3 pulls decisively stronger with 660 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is minimal lighter – 1720 kg compared to 1822 kg. The difference is around 102 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers convincingly more room – 594 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 294 L.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman noticeable takes the win – 530 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 197 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Tesla Model 3
MINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Tesla Model 3
3.6 (3 Reviews)
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
34300 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
303 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.