Compare performance (171 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 51,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or XPeng G9?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the fast-evolving world of electric vehicles, innovation, design, and performance are keys to capturing the attention of savvy consumers. Two contenders in this competitive space are the GWM ORA 03 and the XPeng G9, both bringing their unique attributes to the market as 2024 models. Let's delve into their features, specs, and the technology that sets them apart.
The GWM ORA 03 is a compact, urban-friendly hatchback that's tailored for navigating city streets with ease. With a length between 4,235 and 4,254 mm and a compact width of around 1,825 to 1,848 mm, the vehicle's design emphasizes comfort and convenience for urban dwellers. In contrast, the XPeng G9 takes form as a larger, robust SUV, measuring 4,891 mm in length and sporting a broader width of 1,937 mm, making it a prime choice for those seeking more space and off-road capability.
When it comes to power, the two vehicles diverge significantly. The GWM ORA 03 offers a respectable 171 HP (126 kW), delivering smooth acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 8.2 to 8.3 seconds. Its front-wheel-drive system ensures a balanced ride, complemented by a maximum speed of 160 km/h and torque of 250 Nm.
On the other hand, the XPeng G9 excels with a significantly higher power output. Ranging from 313 HP to an impressive 551 HP, and capable of accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in an astounding 3.9 to 6.4 seconds, the G9 is a powerhouse on wheels. The vehicle offers both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, depending on the variant, and boasts a maximum speed of 200 km/h. Torque figures span from 430 Nm to a substantial 717 Nm, underscoring its dynamic performance credentials.
In terms of efficiency, the GWM ORA 03 offers a consumption rate between 16.5 and 16.8 kWh/100 km, with a decent electric range spanning from 310 to 420 km depending on battery capacity, which ranges from 45.4 kWh to 59.3 kWh. This makes it an excellent choice for city users who value economy without sacrificing range.
The XPeng G9, however, offers a larger battery capacity of 75.8 to 93.1 kWh, granting it a superior range between 460 and 570 km. Despite a higher consumption rate of 19.4 to 21.3 kWh/100 km, the G9's larger battery ensures long-distance capability without frequent recharging.
While both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, they differ in cargo space—a crucial consideration for many buyers. The ORA 03 comes with a modest 228 L trunk capacity, suitable for day-to-day use and smaller families. Meanwhile, the G9 impresses with a substantial 660 L, providing ample room for larger loads and extended trips.
Ultimately, the choice between the GWM ORA 03 and XPeng G9 boils down to lifestyle and needs. Urban drivers who seek efficiency and compact dimensions will find much to appreciate in the ORA 03. Meanwhile, those looking for power, extended range, and expansive space will find the XPeng G9 hard to resist. Both models highlight the innovation and versatility that are the hallmarks of modern electric vehicles, paving the way for the future of automotive travel.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
GWM ORA 03 is clearly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,665 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the GWM ORA 03 is a bit more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 18.4 kWh/100km for the XPeng G9. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the XPeng G9 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 165 km more than the GWM ORA 03.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers clearly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 404 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers considerably more torque with 695 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 445 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, GWM ORA 03 is markedly lighter – 1,615 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 595 kg.
Looking at boot space, the XPeng G9 offers clearly more boot space – 660 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 432 L.
When it comes to payload, the XPeng G9 carries visibly more – 520 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.
The XPeng G9 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
The XPeng G9 is a spacious, tech-forward electric SUV that pairs a calm, refined ride with responsive performance and a high-quality, minimalist cabin. With strong emphasis on connectivity and advanced driving assistance, it’s a compelling choice if you want modern EV features and generous practicality without a legacy badge.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
|
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
660 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
|
Width
1,937 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
515 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España