Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 07 vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (408 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 07 or MINI Aceman?
GWM ORA 07 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ORA 07
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MINI Aceman is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the GWM ORA 07 costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,991 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the GWM ORA 07. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 07 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 520 km, about 165 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 07 offers noticeably more power – delivering 408 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 07 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 07 delivers substantially more torque with 680 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm more.
ORA 07
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is markedly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 345 kg.
Looking at boot space, the GWM ORA 07 offers barely more boot space – 333 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 33 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries markedly more – 530 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The GWM ORA 07 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,000
GWM ORA 07
GWM ORA 07
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
GWM ORA 07
The GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
GWM ORA 07
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,000 - 45,800 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,210 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
333 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.