Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 07 vs MINI Aceman - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (408 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (36000 £ vs 25500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 07 or MINI Aceman?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the GWM ORA 07 costs 36000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10534 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the GWM ORA 07 with 16.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 07 performs distinct better – achieving up to 520 km, about 115 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 07 has a evident edge – offering 408 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 07 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the GWM ORA 07 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: GWM ORA 07 pulls significantly stronger with 680 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is clearly perceptible lighter – 1720 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 345 kg.
In terms of boot space, the GWM ORA 07 offers hardly perceptible more room – 333 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 33 L.
In maximum load capacity, the GWM ORA 07 performs minimal better – up to 1045 L, which is about 40 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman noticeable takes the win – 530 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The GWM ORA 07 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
GWM ORA 07
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,000
GWM ORA 07
GWM ORA 07
The GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.
detailsMINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
GWM ORA 07
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36000 - 45800 £
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
64.3 - 83.5 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2210 kg
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
333 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
4871 mm
|
Length
4079 mm
|
|
Width
1862 mm
|
Width
1754 mm
|
|
Height
1500 mm
|
Height
1514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1045 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
MINI
|
Is the GWM ORA 07 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.