VS

GWM WEY 03 vs VW Tayron – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: GWM WEY 03 or VW Tayron?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Tayron has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 39000 £, while the GWM WEY 03 costs 41100 £. That’s a price difference of around 2079 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Tayron manages with 0.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the GWM WEY 03 with 0.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the GWM WEY 03 performs minimal better – achieving up to 139 km, about 13 km more than the VW Tayron.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM WEY 03 has a noticeable edge – offering 442 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM WEY 03 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the VW Tayron takes 6.10 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Tayron performs barely noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the GWM WEY 03 tops out at 230 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: GWM WEY 03 pulls clearly stronger with 685 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Tayron is clearly perceptible lighter – 1682 kg compared to 2175 kg. The difference is around 493 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW Tayron offers clearly more room – 885 L compared to 517 L. That’s a difference of about 368 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Tayron performs distinct better – up to 2090 L, which is about 801 L more than the GWM WEY 03.

When it comes to payload, VW Tayron clearly perceptible takes the win – 566 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 191 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW Tayron shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £39,000
DB2024AU01656_large

VW Tayron

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.5 L
  • Electric Range : 117 - 126 km
details

GWM WEY 03

The GWM WEY 03 offers a sleek and modern design that captures attention on the road. Its interior is crafted with premium materials, providing a comfortable and luxurious driving experience. Advanced technology features enhance both safety and convenience, making it a compelling choice for the discerning driver.

details

VW Tayron

The Tayron stands out as a stylish and versatile SUV that expertly blends form and function. With its spacious interior and modern design, it caters to families and adventure seekers alike, making every journey enjoyable. Equipped with advanced technology and safety features, the Tayron promises a driving experience that is both secure and exhilarating.

details
DB2024AU01656_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2024AU01657_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2024AU01676_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2024AU01690_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com

Similar Comparisons

VW Touareg
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest showdown between the VW Touareg and the VW Tayron, enthusiasts will find distinct differences in size and performance that cater to varying needs. The Touareg, with its luxurious features and robust engine options, stands out as an ideal choice for those seeking a premium SUV experience. In contrast, the more compact and agile Tayron offers impressive versatility for urban driving and everyday practicality, making it perfect for city dwellers who crave a blend of style and functionality.
Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
GWM WEY 03
VW Tayron
Tayron

Costs and Consumption
Price
41100 - 47900 £
Price
39000 - 52600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.50 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
130 - 139 km
Electric Range
117 - 126 km
Battery Capacity
28.90 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
15 g/km
co2
9 - 192 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2175 - 2295 kg
Curb weight
1682 - 1948 kg
Trunk capacity
517 L
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
Length
4688 mm
Length
4792 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1853 - 1866 mm
Height
1730 mm
Height
1666 - 1668 mm
Max trunk capacity
1289 L
Max trunk capacity
1915 - 2090 L
Payload
375 kg
Payload
489 - 566 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
367 - 442 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
230 km/h
Max Speed
204 - 240 km/h
Torque
500 - 685 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
270 - 325 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1998 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, F, G
Brand
GWM
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

VW Touran
VW Tayron
VS
The VW Touran remains the no-nonsense family workhorse — clever 7-seat packaging, sliding rear seats and sensible engines make it the practical choice when boot space and child seats are top priorities. The VW Tayron, by contrast, dresses up as a chunky SUV with higher stance and sharper styling, offering a more car‑like ride and road presence if you value comfort and looks over outright interior flexibility.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and driving pep, but the Kodiaq will still win the school run.
CUPRA Terramar
VW Tayron
VS
The CUPRA Terramar leans into bold design and a taut, driver-focused setup that makes everyday commutes feel borderline fun — it’s the crossover for buyers who want hot-hatch spirit with a bit more room. The VW Tayron, by contrast, plays the sensible card: spacious, quietly refined and firmly aimed at comfort and practicality, ideal if you prefer passenger space and calm cruising over sporty theatrics.
Volvo XC90
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, but it can’t quite match the XC90’s space, refinement or badge cachet—pick methodical comfort or cheeky bargain brilliance.
Toyota RAV4
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and reputation for reliability. Meanwhile, the Volkswagen Tayron impresses with its sleek design and tech-savvy interior, appealing to those who prioritize a modern driving experience. While the RAV4 excels in versatility and off-road capability, the Tayron offers a more engaging drive, making the choice between the two a matter of personal preference.
VW Tiguan
VW Tayron
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the VW Tiguan and VW Tayron present distinct choices for consumers seeking versatility and style. While the Tiguan is renowned for its spacious interior and family-friendly features, the Tayron offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two models hinges on whether drivers prioritize practicality or a spirited, engaging ride.
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a versatile SUV for both urban and adventurous lifestyles. Ultimately, both vehicles offer unique strengths, catering to different preferences in the competitive midsize SUV market.
VW Passat
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Passat and VW Tayron showcase distinct strengths tailored to different driver preferences. The Passat excels in providing a spacious sedan experience with a focus on comfort and refinement, making it ideal for long journeys. In contrast, the Tayron offers a more dynamic and compact SUV profile, appealing to those seeking versatility and a higher driving position without compromising on style.
Is the GWM WEY 03 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.