Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Honda CR-V vs Mercedes EQT - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (184 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (42800 £ vs 27800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Mercedes EQT?
CR-V
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQT has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27800 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14997 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQT performs convincingly better – achieving up to 278 km, about 199 km more than the Honda CR-V.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V has a distinct edge – offering 184 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 3.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Honda CR-V performs distinct better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Honda CR-V pulls noticeable stronger with 335 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CR-V
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Honda CR-V is slight lighter – 1821 kg compared to 1925 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers a bit more room – 617 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT performs to a small extent better – up to 1979 L, which is about 269 L more than the Honda CR-V.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQT a bit takes the win – 531 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mercedes EQT shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £27,800
Mercedes EQT
Honda CR-V
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Honda CR-V
5 (1 Reviews)
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Honda CR-V
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42800 - 52100 £
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
19 - 152 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
4706 mm
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
|
Width
1866 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1673 mm
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
What drivetrain options does the Honda CR-V have?
The Honda CR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.