VS

Honda CR-V vs Kia Niro comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 138 HP), boot space and price (40,200 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Kia Niro?

Honda CR-V vs Kia Niro: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Kia Niro

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia Niro is visibly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Kia Niro with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

Niro

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers markedly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers noticeably more torque with 335 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Niro is noticeably lighter – 1,474 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 347 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly more boot space – 617 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 166 L.

When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries very slightly more – 475 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,200
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 78 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Kia Niro
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives like a tech-savvy upstart — all-electric, sharp to drive and crammed with the latest infotainment and safety kit, ideal if you want a compact crossover that feels like the future. The Niro, meanwhile, stays the sensible all‑rounder: proven, roomy and available as a hybrid, …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Honda CR-V
Kia Niro

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Henk van der Werf
1 Jun 2026, 20:15:51

The fuel economy you report in your test is, of course, nonsense. This is a plug-in, and so you're being fooled. Of course a CR‑V isn't more economical than an HR‑V. Think!

Roger
23 May 2026, 22:21:51

My 2026 CR‑V hybrid has had no problems. It’s quieter than my previous 2019 RAV4 hybrid. The exterior finish feels more solid across the whole vehicle. It’s less affected by crosswinds. I prefer the CR‑V’s driving. Its only drawback is that it uses just a little more fuel than the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
19 May 2026, 07:08:56

Very comfortable, lots of space, combined fuel consumption about 6 l, reliable, simple to operate, without unnecessary gadgets, very well made, easy to drive, a car for the city and long trips.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Kia Niro

The Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08
Kia_Niro_HEV_24
Kia_Niro_HEV_22
Kia_Niro_HEV_05
Kia_Niro_HEV_13

Reviews Kia Niro

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
pip
11 Jul 2026, 08:42:12

nice size, roomy for passengers, lots of bells and whistles as standard, magnificent fuel economy,well made , 7 year warranty

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Archi
25 Mar 2026, 13:11:41

Efficient, functional, understated, spacious and comfortable. No surprises: it delivers what it promises and does its job without fanfare. Good buy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Wolfgang Schäfer
21 Oct 2025, 14:01:32

I've been driving the Kia Niro since 2019 and am still very happy with this car.

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
The Honda CR-V and Lexus NX are two of the most sensible compact crossovers on the market—one prized for roomy practicality and strong value, the other for luxury, refinement and a more premium driving experience. This comparison shows how the CR-V’s efficient, user-friendly package stacks up …
Kia Niro
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Niro and MG ZS are compact crossovers that both promise practical space and everyday usability, but they take different routes — the Niro leans on efficiency, refinement and proven hybrid/electric technology, while the ZS competes on sharp pricing and generous equipment. If you prioritise …
Kia Niro
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Kia Niro feels like the sensible crossover hero — roomy, composed and blessed with a polished hybrid system that trims fuel bills without stripping comfort. The Toyota Yaris Cross is smaller and cheekier, nailing city agility and frugal running costs, so pick the Niro for family practicality …
Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; …
Kia Niro
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of fuel efficiency and practicality, the Kia Niro emerges as a versatile hybrid crossover while the Toyota Yaris stands out as a compact and agile hatchback. The Niro offers a spacious interior and advanced tech features, catering to families and eco-conscious drivers alike, whereas …
Kia Niro
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Kia Niro and the Nissan Qashqai occupy similar compact crossover territory but take different approaches: the Niro emphasizes efficiency and clever interior packaging, while the Qashqai leans toward a more conventional SUV feel with sharper road manners. This short comparison outlines the key …
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
Choosing between the Kia Niro and the Toyota C-HR comes down to whether you prioritize efficiency and practicality or bold styling and a sportier ride. This quick comparison highlights the Niro’s roomy, fuel-efficient approach versus the C-HR’s striking design and agile feel to help you pick the …
Kia Niro
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV market, the Kia Niro and Skoda Karoq both offer unique strengths for potential buyers. The Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and hybrid options, catering to the environmentally conscious driver. On the other hand, the Skoda Karoq boasts a …
Honda CR-V
Kia Niro

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
102 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
1,474 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
451 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
466 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
138 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
102 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Honda
Brand
Kia
Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.