VS

Honda CR-V vs Kia Niro – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Honda CR-V or Kia Niro fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V @ hondanews.eu

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia Niro has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 13637 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 0.90 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Kia Niro with 2.40 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Honda CR-V performs noticeable better – achieving up to 79 km, about 17 km more than the Kia Niro.

Niro @ press.kia.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V has a minimal edge – offering 184 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 4 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Honda CR-V performs slight better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Kia Niro tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Honda CR-V pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 335 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

CR-V @ hondanews.eu

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Niro is noticeable lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1821 kg. The difference is around 347 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers noticeable more room – 617 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 166 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Honda CR-V performs somewhat better – up to 1710 L, which is about 265 L more than the Kia Niro.

When it comes to payload, Honda CR-V hardly perceptible takes the win – 475 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Honda CR-V proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Honda CR-V is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800
42223_CR-V_2015

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 - 6.7 L
  • Electric Range : 79 km
details

Honda CR-V

5 (1)
rate

The Honda CR-V presents a blend of practicality and comfort, making it a reliable choice for families and adventure seekers alike. With its spacious interior and refined design, it offers a pleasant driving experience whether in urban environments or on long road trips. This model also boasts a range of advanced safety features, enhancing driver confidence and passenger security.

details
42223_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42220_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42219_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42241_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu

Kia Niro

5 (1)
rate

The Kia Niro presents itself as a versatile and eco-friendly SUV, blending a stylish design with advanced hybrid technology. Its spacious interior offers comfort and practicality, making it ideal for both city driving and longer journeys. With a focus on efficiency and sustainability, the Niro is a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_24 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_22 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_05 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_13 @ press.kia.com

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; if you want style, a bit of fun and a nicer interior, the T‑Roc is the one to tempt you.
Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for those seeking a more dynamic experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two Kia models comes down to personal preference, with each catering to different lifestyle needs.
Honda CR-V
Kia Niro
CR-V
Niro

Costs and Consumption
Price
42800 - 52100 £
Price
29100 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
co2
19 - 152 g/km
co2
53 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 57 L
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Length
4706 mm
Length
4420 mm
Width
1866 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1673 - 1684 mm
Height
1545 mm
Max trunk capacity
1634 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
466 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
Max Speed
187 - 195 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
Engine capacity
1580 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Honda
Brand
Kia

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their distinct advantages. The Kia Niro impresses with its hybrid and all-electric options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and eco-friendly performance, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq offers a robust yet comfortable drive with a well-appointed interior, catering to those who prioritize practicality and style in urban settings.
Kia EV3
Kia Niro
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the Kia EV3 stands out with its futuristic design and impressive range, appealing to tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Kia Niro offers a balanced blend of practicality and efficiency, making it a strong contender for families looking for a versatile hybrid option. Both models showcase Kia's commitment to sustainability, but prospective buyers will need to consider their unique needs and driving styles to choose the right fit.
Kia Niro
Lexus LBX
VS
In the latest showdown between the Kia Niro and the Lexus LBX, both compact SUVs deliver distinctive attributes tailored to different types of drivers. The Kia Niro offers a practical and economical choice with its hybrid technology, making it ideal for environmentally conscious buyers who prioritize fuel efficiency and space. Meanwhile, the Lexus LBX stands out with its luxurious interior feel and advanced technology, catering to those who value a premium driving experience and a more refined aesthetic.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR present compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers seeking a stylish and efficient crossover. The Niro, with its hybrid and electric options, emphasizes fuel economy and a spacious interior, making it ideal for families or those with cargo needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR offers a more dynamic exterior design, appealing to those who prioritize a bold aesthetic alongside a spirited driving experience.
Honda CR-V
Kia Sportage
VS
Honda CR-V
MG HS/EHS
VS
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Niro
VS
In a thrilling showdown between the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Niro, both cars showcase impressive practicality and modern design, appealing to urban drivers seeking versatility. The Bayon impresses with its bold aesthetics and spacious interior, while the Niro stands out for its eco-friendly hybrid options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models comes down to personal preference, as they both deliver excellent performance and comfort in their respective segments.
What drivetrain options does the Honda CR-V have?

The Honda CR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.