VS

Honda CR-V vs Mercedes Marco Polo comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (40,200 £ vs 57,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Mercedes Marco Polo?

Honda CR-V vs Mercedes Marco Polo: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • visibly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Honda CR-V is substantially cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,285 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.8 L/100km.

Marco Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers visibly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Marco Polo is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers markedly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Honda CR-V offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is markedly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 629 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers very slightly more boot space – 670 L compared to 617 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,200
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 78 km
Honda CR-V
Mercedes Marco Polo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
Honda CR-V
Mercedes Marco Polo

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
194 - 218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
670 L
Length
-
Length
5,140 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,975 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
555 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Honda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.