VS

Honda CR-V vs Volvo EC40 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Honda CR-V meets Volvo EC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Honda CR-V has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £, while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £. That’s a price difference of around 3849 £.

As for range, the Volvo EC40 performs significantly better – achieving up to 584 km, about 505 km more than the Honda CR-V.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a decisively edge – offering 442 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 258 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 4.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Honda CR-V performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Volvo EC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EC40 pulls clearly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 335 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Honda CR-V is somewhat lighter – 1821 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 244 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly perceptible more room – 617 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 213 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Honda CR-V performs noticeable better – up to 1710 L, which is about 514 L more than the Volvo EC40.

When it comes to payload, Honda CR-V minimal takes the win – 475 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo EC40 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £46,600
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 488 - 584 km
details

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V presents a blend of practicality and comfort, making it a reliable choice for families and adventure seekers alike. With its spacious interior and refined design, it offers a pleasant driving experience whether in urban environments or on long road trips. This model also boasts a range of advanced safety features, enhancing driver confidence and passenger security.

details
42223_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42220_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42219_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42241_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 seamlessly combines cutting-edge technology with sleek Scandinavian design, offering a refined driving experience. With its advanced safety features and user-friendly infotainment system, this model caters to both seasoned drivers and modern tech enthusiasts. The vehicle's impressive efficiency and environmentally conscious engineering make it a standout choice for those seeking sustainability without compromising on style.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Honda CR-V
Kia Sportage
VS
Honda CR-V
Volvo EC40
CR-V
EC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
42800 - 52100 £
Price
46600 - 59000 £
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
co2
19 - 152 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 57 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
4706 mm
Length
4440 mm
Width
1866 mm
Width
1873 mm
Height
1673 - 1684 mm
Height
1591 mm
Max trunk capacity
1634 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
187 - 195 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Honda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
In the latest head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EC40 and EX40, enthusiasts will appreciate the subtle design differences and performance variations that set these two electric models apart. While the EC40 leans toward a more rugged, SUV-like stance, the EX40 offers a sleek, urban vibe with its compact dimensions. Both vehicles showcase Volvo's commitment to sustainability, but prospective buyers will likely gravitate towards the model that best fits their lifestyle and driving preferences.
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
CUPRA Tavascan
Volvo EC40
VS
Honda CR-V
Hyundai Tucson
VS
Honda CR-V
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of practicality and safety, the Honda CR-V and Volvo XC60 each showcase their own strengths in the compact SUV segment. The CR-V is renowned for its spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for families seeking reliability. Meanwhile, the XC60 stands out with its luxurious finish and advanced safety features, appealing to those who prioritize comfort and cutting-edge technology in their driving experience.
Honda CR-V
Mercedes GLC
VS
In the competitive cross-over landscape, the Honda CR-V and Mercedes GLC both offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Honda CR-V stands out with its practicality, excellent fuel economy, and affordable pricing, making it an ideal choice for families seeking reliability without breaking the bank. On the other hand, the Mercedes GLC shines with luxury, superior handling, and advanced technology, perfect for those who prioritize a premium driving experience and sophisticated aesthetics.
Kia EV3
Volvo EC40
VS
What drivetrain options does the Honda CR-V have?

The Honda CR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.