Compare performance (90 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (20,500 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Bayon or Skoda Fabia?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact and versatile automobiles, the Hyundai Bayon and the Skoda Fabia emerge as strong contenders. With their unique appeal, impressive technical specifications, and innovative features, choosing the right fit for urban driving requires a closer look at both options. Let’s dive into the specifics and see how these two popular models stack up against each other.
The Hyundai Bayon, with its SUV body type, exudes a robust and sporty presence thanks to its dimensions of 4180 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and 1500 mm in height. It offers ample space with a trunk capacity of 411 liters, making it ideal for both city commutes and weekend getaways. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia, a hatchback, appeals with its sleek design, slightly shorter in length at 4108 mm but similarly spacious with a trunk capacity of 380 liters.
The Hyundai Bayon is equipped with a 998 cm3, three-cylinder petrol engine that delivers 100 HP (74 kW) of power and offers a smooth driving experience with a dual option of manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission. Whether manual or automatic, the Bayon achieves a 0-100 km/h acceleration in just under 12.4 seconds and boasts a top speed of 179 km/h.
Conversely, the Skoda Fabia offers a broader range of power options, starting from 80 HP and going up to 150 HP. Its engine options include both three and four-cylinder variants, with engine capacities ranging from 999 cm3 to 1498 cm3. The Fabia can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 8 seconds while reaching maximum speeds of up to 225 km/h in its higher trims.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Bayon offers a consumption rate of 5.4 L/100 km and a CO2 emission of 122 g/km, classifying it in the D CO2 efficiency class. The Fabia, meanwhile, is more diverse in its consumption figures depending on the engine choice, ranging from 5 to 5.5 L/100 km, with a CO2 emission as low as 112 g/km, earning some variants a C class in CO2 efficiency.
Both the Hyundai Bayon and the Skoda Fabia come with a front-wheel drive, presenting a similar driving feel that's well-suited for urban environments. Each model seats five passengers, offering comfort-driven interiors with modern technology and infotainment systems tailored for today's needs.
The Bayon emphasizes a higher driving position typical of SUVs, enhancing visibility and road presence, whereas the Fabia's hatchback style appeals to those looking for nimble maneuvering and compact simplicity without compromising on interior comfort.
The choice between the Hyundai Bayon and the Skoda Fabia boils down to personal preference and individual needs. The Bayon stands out for those seeking an SUV's practicality and higher riding experience without excessive bulk. In contrast, the Fabia caters to a wider performance range and the elegant simplicity of a hatchback format, ideal for those prioritizing engine variety and dynamic driving.
Both vehicles promise reliability and efficiency with their 2024 models, leaving the decision to be made according to lifestyle, driving preferences, and performance demand.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Fabia is a bit cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Hyundai Bayon costs 20,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,180 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Fabia uses 4.9 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Hyundai Bayon with 5.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia offers significantly more power – delivering 177 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.9 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Fabia delivers markedly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 172 Nm. That’s about 78 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is very slightly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,175 kg. The difference is around 32 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Bayon offers only slightly more boot space – 411 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Bayon carries very slightly more – 460 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.
The Skoda Fabia is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,500 - 26,200 £
|
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
130 - 132 g/km
|
co2
112 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,200 kg
|
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
411 L
|
Trunk capacity
380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 mm
|
Width
1,780 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 460 kg
|
Payload
402 - 437 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
90 HP
|
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
172 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
66 kW
|
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España