Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Hyundai Kona vs Jaguar I-Pace - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 400 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 79200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Jaguar I-Pace?
Kona
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Hyundai Kona has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Jaguar I-Pace costs 79200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 56143 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s convincingly more efficient than the Jaguar I-Pace with 25.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 10.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 514 km, about 45 km more than the Jaguar I-Pace.
I-Pace
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar I-Pace has a convincingly edge – offering 400 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar I-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 3 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Jaguar I-Pace tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar I-Pace pulls decisively stronger with 696 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 431 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kona
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is decisively lighter – 1370 kg compared to 2226 kg. The difference is around 856 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jaguar I-Pace offers clearly perceptible more room – 638 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jaguar I-Pace performs slightly better – up to 1453 L, which is about 153 L more than the Hyundai Kona.
When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona slight takes the win – 490 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Hyundai Kona
Jaguar I-Pace
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £23,100
Hyundai Kona
Hyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Jaguar I-Pace
The Jaguar I-Pace pairs instantaneous electric shove with graceful, feline looks, so it never feels like you're piloting a refrigerator with style. Inside it serves proper Jaguar luxury and clever packaging, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want EV convenience without losing personality.
details
Hyundai Kona
Jaguar I-Pace
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
Price
79200 - 85500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
25.20 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
469 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
84.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
Curb weight
2226 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
638 L
|
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
Length
4682 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
2011 mm
|
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
Height
1566 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1453 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
444 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
400 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
696 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
294 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.