In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro stand out with their unique offerings. While the Kona boasts a sportier design and thrilling performance, the Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly options, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers. Ultimately, both models provide impressive features and versatility, catering to a wide range of consumer preferences.
As the compact SUV segment grows in popularity, the comparison between competitors becomes increasingly crucial for potential buyers. Two standout models in this category are the Hyundai Kona and the Kia Niro. While both brands fall under the umbrella of the Hyundai Motor Group, they offer unique features and capabilities that appeal to different types of drivers.
Starting with exterior dimensions, the Hyundai Kona boasts a length of 4,350 mm and a height of 1,585 mm, making it slightly more substantial than the Kia Niro, which measures 4,420 mm in length and 1,545 mm in height. Both vehicles have a width of 1,825 mm, providing a stable stance on the road.
In terms of aesthetic appeal, the Kona carries a bold and sporty design with aggressive lines and a distinct front fascia, aimed at drivers seeking a more dynamic look. The Niro, however, adopts a more streamlined appearance that emphasizes efficiency and eco-friendliness, highlighting its hybrid and plug-in hybrid capabilities.
The Hyundai Kona offers a broader range of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and electric variants. Power outputs range from 100 HP to a robust 218 HP in the electric model, catering to a wider audience. The Kona's acceleration performance is impressive, with certain models achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.8 seconds, demonstrating strong performance across the board.
On the other hand, the Kia Niro is more focused on hybrid technology, offering full hybrid and plug-in hybrid configurations with power outputs up to 171 HP. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 10.4 seconds at its quickest, which is decent yet reflective of its hybrid nature. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency, achieving consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km in its plug-in hybrid variant.
When it comes to electric capabilities, the Kia Niro’s plug-in hybrid offers an electric range of approximately 65 km, enabling limited all-electric driving. However, the Hyundai Kona outshines in this area, with its electric variant providing up to 514 km on a single charge—making it a more appealing choice for those seeking longer ranges and electric driving.
The battery capacity of the Kona also surpasses that of the Niro, with options reaching up to 65.4 kWh compared to the Niro’s 11.1 kWh in its hybrid variants. This difference significantly impacts overall efficiency and driving range.
Inside, both models provide rooms for five passengers with spaciousness conducive to comfort. The Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, slightly outpacing the Niro's 451 liters. However, the Niro's interior leans heavily into eco-conscious materials and innovative tech, aligning with its green image.
Infotainment systems in both vehicles are user-friendly, equipped with modern connectivity options such as Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. The Niro boasts advanced driver assistance features that advocate safety and convenience, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist.
The choice between the Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro ultimately lies in the buyer's needs and preferences. The Kona stands out for those desiring versatility in powertrains and a sporty aesthetic. Conversely, the Kia Niro caters to eco-conscious consumers looking for hybrid efficiency and cutting-edge technological features.
Both vehicles exemplify the quality and innovation of their respective brands, making them excellent contenders in the compact SUV market. Regardless of the choice, prospective buyers will find satisfaction in the performance, comfort, and technology these models have to offer.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 22600 - 41600
£
|
Price
about 28100 - 37800
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 4.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 514
km
|
Electric Range
59 - 65
km
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1
kWh
|
co2
128, 103, 141, 152, 0
g/km
|
co2
19 - 100
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773
kg
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594
kg
|
Trunk capacity
466
L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451
L
|
Length
4350 - 4385
mm
|
Length
4420
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1545
mm
|
Payload
420 - 490
kg
|
Payload
466
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
100 - 218
HP
|
Power HP
129 - 171
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 13.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.4 - 11.3
s
|
Max Speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 161
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 265
Nm
|
Torque
265
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
74 - 160
kW
|
Power kW
95 - 126
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1580
cm3
|
Top speed
162 - 208
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 161
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Kia
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.