Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Hyundai Kona vs Mitsubishi Colt - Differences and prices compared
Kona
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi Colt has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18200 £, while the Hyundai Kona costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4895 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Colt manages with 4.20 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.60 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Kona
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a evident edge – offering 218 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls noticeable stronger with 265 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm difference.
Kona
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is a bit lighter – 1189 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers somewhat more room – 466 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs to a small extent better – up to 1300 L, which is about 231 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.
When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona evident takes the win – 490 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Hyundai Kona shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £23,100
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
Hyundai Kona
Mitsubishi Colt
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Hyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Mitsubishi Colt
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
Hyundai Kona
Mitsubishi Colt
|
@ Hyundai Motor Company
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
Price
18200 - 25000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
Curb weight
1189 - 1380 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
Length
4053 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1798 mm
|
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
Height
1439 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.