Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Hyundai Kona vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison
Compare performance (204 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Mitsubishi Colt?
Hyundai Kona vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kona
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Colt is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,895 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Colt
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers visibly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers markedly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm more.
Kona
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is somewhat lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 181 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers a bit more boot space – 466 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries noticeably more – 490 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,100
Hyundai Kona
Hyundai Kona
Mitsubishi Colt
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Hyundai Kona
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Mitsubishi Colt
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
Hyundai Kona
Mitsubishi Colt
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.