Compare performance (218 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 22,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Peugeot Rifter?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Peugeot Rifter is only slightly cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 197 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Hyundai Kona is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Peugeot Rifter. That’s a difference of about 3.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers markedly more range – reaching up to 514 km, about 175 km more than the Peugeot Rifter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers noticeably more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Hyundai Kona is noticeably faster – reaching 172 km/h, while the Peugeot Rifter tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Rifter delivers moderately more torque with 300 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is very slightly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers clearly more boot space – 1,050 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 584 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Peugeot Rifter offers significantly more capacity – up to 3,500 L, about 2,200 L more than the Hyundai Kona.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries visibly more – 814 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 324 kg.
The Hyundai Kona comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
detailsThe Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
|
Price
22,900 - 36,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 19.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
328 - 339 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,941 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
|
|
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
|
Length
4,405 - 4,755 mm
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,580 mm
|
Height
1,818 - 1,837 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,000 - 3,500 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
489 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E, F
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Peugeot
|