VS

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Skoda Fabia?

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Fabia: A Battle of Distinctive Appeal and Innovation

In the rapidly evolving automotive scene, two brands are bringing their distinctive perspectives to the table, each appealing to a different segment of car enthusiasts. The Hyundai Kona and Skoda Fabia are excellent examples of how diverse innovation can be within the industry. With the Kona leading with versatility and power options, while the Fabia shines with efficiency and practicality, let's delve into how these models stack up against each other.

Fabia

Body Types and Design Philosophy

The Hyundai Kona is designed as an SUV, providing the robust stance and spacious interior that typifies this category. Measuring 4355mm in length and 1825mm in width, the Kona offers a commanding presence and ample cabin space, making it ideal for families and adventure seekers alike. Its higher ground clearance and rugged styling reflect its all-terrain capabilities.

On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia embraces its identity as a hatchback, characterized by its compact and agile design. With dimensions of 4108mm in length and 1780mm in width, the Fabia is tailored for urban environments where maneuverability and ease of parking are paramount. Its design is practical and understated, appealing to those who prioritize functionality and economy.

Kona

Powertrains and Performance

Hyundai offers a complete spectrum for the Kona, from petrol and hybrid to electric variants. Power output ranges from 100 HP to a robust 218 HP, serving a wide array of driving preferences. The Kona also impresses with its acceleration capabilities, reaching 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.8 seconds in certain models, and a top speed of up to 208 km/h. Moreover, with an electric range of up to 514 km, eco-conscious drivers are well catered for.

Skoda's Fabia focuses on efficiency, solely utilizing petrol engines. Its offerings range from 80 HP to 150 HP, with the more spirited versions achieving 0-100 km/h in around 8 seconds, and a top speed of 225 km/h, which is quite impressive for a hatchback. Skoda’s model emphasizes fuel efficiency, with a consumption rate as low as 5.0L/100km, a testament to its competency in city driving.

Fabia

Technological Innovations and Features

The Hyundai Kona is equipped with pioneering technology, featuring advanced hybrid systems and a fully electric drivetrain. These innovations translate to a superior CO2 efficiency class rating of 'A' for electric models, and numerous driver-assist and safety technologies that enhance its appeal in the SUV market.

The Skoda Fabia, while focused on simplicity, does not skimp on technology. The inclusion of modern infotainment systems, intuitive controls, and a robust safety suite with numerous assistive features, ensures the Fabia is more than capable of handling the complexities of modern travel efficiently.

Kona

Practicality and Comfort

The Kona's larger body ensures a spacious interior and a generous trunk capacity of 466L. Its adaptable layout is perfect for those needing extra space without sacrificing passenger comfort, and it supports a payload capacity of up to 490 kg.

While smaller, the Fabia's interior is ingeniously designed to maximize space, offering a practical trunk capacity of 380L. Its efficient use of space is complemented by a payload capacity of up to 457 kg, making it a versatile choice for urban commutes.

Fabia

Conclusion

Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and Skoda Fabia boils down to lifestyle needs and preferences. The Kona appeals to those who prioritize power, rugged versatility, and eco-friendly innovations. In contrast, the Fabia is perfect for drivers who prefer efficiency, compact practicality, and urban-friendly dynamics. Both vehicles reflect the brand ethos beautifully, presenting potential buyers with unique choices for a variety of driving adventures.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 go head-to-head in the compact electric crossover ring, pitting Kona’s tried-and-tested practicality against the EV3’s fresh-faced ambition. Which wins your driveway comes down to whether you want proven comfort and range or a cheeky new contender with surprising …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Fabia is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,752 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers a bit more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers only slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is somewhat lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 227 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers a bit more boot space – 466 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries slightly more – 490 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 380 - 510 km
details
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon is the bargain city-slicker — a compact, sensible B‑SUV that maximizes practicality and running costs for urban buyers, while the Hyundai Kona steps up with sharper styling, punchier engines (and even AWD and electrified options) for drivers who want a bit more sparkle and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
Two icons of the small-car world go head-to-head: the Skoda Fabia, the bargain-minded all-rounder, takes on the VW Golf, the class benchmark for driving refinement and pedigree. We’ll compare space, tech, engines and running costs to tell buyers which one delivers the best balance of value, comfort …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Sportage
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Sportage go head-to-head in the compact-SUV ring — the Kona is cheeky, city-savvy and punchy, while the Sportage leans into grown-up comfort and family-friendly practicality. We’ll break down which one gives you sharper driving thrills, better everyday usability and the …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact crossovers that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with SUV styling. This comparison looks at driving feel, interior practicality, fuel efficiency and running costs to help you choose which suits your everyday needs.
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
The SEAT Ibiza brings snap, youthful styling and engaging handling that makes town driving feel like a mini hot hatch, while the Škoda Fabia answers with roomy practicality, clever storage and a smoother, more accomplished everyday ride. Pick the Ibiza if you want flair and fun; choose the Fabia if …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Skoda
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.