VS

Jaguar E-Pace vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (269 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (32,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Mazda CX-80?

Jaguar E-Pace vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Jaguar E-Pace

  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • a bit lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

E-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jaguar E-Pace is significantly cheaper – starting at 32,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,928 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar E-Pace uses 1.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jaguar E-Pace offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 69 km, about 9 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers somewhat more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Jaguar E-Pace takes 7.3 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers barely more torque with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

E-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Jaguar E-Pace is a bit lighter – 1,783 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 348 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar E-Pace offers significantly more boot space – 494 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 236 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries slightly more – 650 kg compared to 554 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar E-Pace stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,400
E-Pace

Jaguar E-Pace

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 69 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Jaguar E-Pace
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar E-Pace

The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.

details
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_8342
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_0067
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_7835
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_Interior_100321_6884
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_Loadspace_100321_1072

Reviews Jaguar E-Pace

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Jaguar E-Pace
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
Jaguar E-Pace and Jaguar I-Pace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar E-Pace or the …
Audi Q3
Jaguar E-Pace
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology, making it an appealing choice for tech-savvy drivers. Conversely, the Jaguar E-Pace captivates with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more exhilarating experience behind …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Dacia Sandero
Jaguar E-Pace
VS
Dacia Sandero and Jaguar E-Pace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Dacia Sandero or the …
Jaguar E-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
VS
Jaguar E-Pace and Jaguar F-Pace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar E-Pace or the …
Jaguar E-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Jaguar E-Pace and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar …
Jaguar E-Pace
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,400 - 56,100 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
69 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
11.5 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
33 - 185 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,783 - 2,173 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
494 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,984 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,648 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,170 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
497 - 554 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Jaguar E-Pace?

The Jaguar E-Pace is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.