VS

Jaguar I-Pace vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (79,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar I-Pace or Mazda CX-80?

Jaguar I-Pace vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Jaguar I-Pace

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

I-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is significantly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Jaguar I-Pace costs 79,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,872 £.

As for electric range, the Jaguar I-Pace offers clearly more range – reaching up to 469 km, about 409 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar I-Pace offers somewhat more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar I-Pace is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar I-Pace delivers clearly more torque with 696 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 146 Nm more.

I-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is barely lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,226 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar I-Pace offers clearly more boot space – 638 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 380 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 206 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar I-Pace is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £79,200
I-Pace

Jaguar I-Pace

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 25.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 469 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Jaguar I-Pace
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar I-Pace

The Jaguar I-Pace pairs instantaneous electric shove with graceful, feline looks, so it never feels like you're piloting a refrigerator with style. Inside it serves proper Jaguar luxury and clever packaging, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want EV convenience without losing personality.

details
Jag_I-PACE_22MY_Black_Exterior_20.04.21_001
Jag_I-PACE_22MY_Black_Exterior_20.04.21_002
Jag_I-PACE_21MY_Interior_23.06.20_001_HomeScreen

Reviews Jaguar I-Pace

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
Michael Spray
18 Jul 2026, 15:05:52

An amazing all round car/suv. I've had them all but this is brilliant! Comfort, speed,handling and insane acceleration.
Beautiful all round car and second hand incredible value!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Stefan
3 Apr 2026, 10:23:27

The Ipace is a tragedy. Looks nice..but the quality is very low. After 30000km I changed the charger, I changed the heater..aprox 8000 euro cost. Not recomend in any eay. Avoid it!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Jaguar I-Pace
Tesla Model 3
VS
Jaguar I-Pace and Tesla Model 3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar I-Pace or the …
Jaguar I-Pace
Ferrari Luce
VS
Jaguar I-Pace and Ferrari Luce go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar I-Pace or the …
Jaguar E-Pace
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
Jaguar E-Pace and Jaguar I-Pace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar E-Pace or the …
Jaguar I-Pace
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Jaguar I-Pace and Skoda Enyaq go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar I-Pace or the …
BYD Seal U
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
BYD Seal U and Jaguar I-Pace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Jaguar …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
In the electrifying world of electric SUVs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Jaguar I-Pace stand out as fierce competitors. The Mustang Mach-E impresses with its sporty handling and spacious interior, offering a versatile solution for those seeking a fusion of performance and practicality. Meanwhile, …
Jaguar I-Pace
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
79,200 - 85,500 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
25.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
469 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
84.7 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,226 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
638 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4,682 mm
Length
-
Width
2,011 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,566 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,453 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
444 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
400 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
696 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
294 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Jaguar I-Pace?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.