VS

Jaguar I-Pace vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (79,200 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar I-Pace or Volvo XC60?

Jaguar I-Pace vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Jaguar I-Pace

3.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

I-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC60 is clearly cheaper – starting at 58,300 £ , while the Jaguar I-Pace costs 79,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,923 £.

As for electric range, the Jaguar I-Pace offers clearly more range – reaching up to 469 km, about 390 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers only slightly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 400 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar I-Pace is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar I-Pace delivers very slightly more torque with 696 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm more.

I-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC60 is only slightly lighter – 2,150 kg compared to 2,226 kg. The difference is around 76 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries somewhat more – 510 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar I-Pace is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £79,200
I-Pace

Jaguar I-Pace

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 25.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 469 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Jaguar I-Pace
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar I-Pace

The Jaguar I-Pace pairs instantaneous electric shove with graceful, feline looks, so it never feels like you're piloting a refrigerator with style. Inside it serves proper Jaguar luxury and clever packaging, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want EV convenience without losing personality.

details
Jag_I-PACE_22MY_Black_Exterior_20.04.21_001
Jag_I-PACE_22MY_Black_Exterior_20.04.21_002
Jag_I-PACE_21MY_Interior_23.06.20_001_HomeScreen

Reviews Jaguar I-Pace

3.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Stefan
3 Apr 2026, 10:23:27

The Ipace is a tragedy. Looks nice..but the quality is very low. After 30000km I changed the charger, I changed the heater..aprox 8000 euro cost. Not recomend in any eay. Avoid it!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
Deciding between the BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 is essentially a choice between a sportier, more driver-focused compact SUV and a roomier, comfort-and-safety-oriented mid‑size contender. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, fuel economy and running costs to help you pick the …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Discovery Sport
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the Land Rover Discovery Sport are two popular premium SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking a blend of comfort, safety and capability. The XC60 leans toward refined on-road manners and class-leading safety tech, while the Discovery Sport emphasizes off-road ability and flexible …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
The Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 are two of the top contenders in the compact luxury SUV class, each bringing a distinct take on comfort, technology and driving dynamics. If you prioritize sporty refinement and a plush, tech-forward cabin the GLC is a strong choice; if you value Scandinavian design, …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out as a versatile compact SUV, offering excellent fuel efficiency and a practical interior. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 is a luxury midsize SUV that impresses with its superior safety features and high-end cabin materials. While the Qashqai is a great choice for those …
Jaguar I-Pace
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
79,200 - 85,500 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
25.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
469 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
84.7 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,226 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
638 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,682 mm
Length
-
Width
2,011 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,566 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,453 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
444 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
400 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
696 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
294 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Jaguar I-Pace?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.