Compare performance (225 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Mazda CX-60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact SUVs, two standout models are turning heads in 2024: the Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-60. Both vehicles offer a blend of style and innovation, each catering to the adventurous spirit of modern drivers. Let's dive into an in-depth comparison to see how they stack up against each other.
The 2024 Jeep Compass offers a choice between Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (MHEV) and Plugin Hybrid engines. With power outputs ranging from 130 to 240 HP, it's suitable for varied driving preferences. The Compass provides a balanced consumption of 5.5 L/100km in its MHEV variant to an extremely efficient 2 L/100km in the Plugin Hybrid.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 delivers powerful Plugin Hybrid and Diesel MHEV engine options, reaching up to 327 HP. The CX-60 boasts an impressive efficiency, with a Plugin Hybrid consumption rate of just 1.4 L/100km, making it a strong contender for eco-conscious drivers seeking performance.
Jeep Compass offers both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive options across its variants, adopting a versatility suitable for any terrain. The dual-clutch automatic and automatic gearbox options make for smooth transitions and responsive handling.
Mazda CX-60 makes a bold statement with its Rear-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive selections, merging driving dynamics with the confidence of classic SUV speed and control. Its automatic gearbox ensures seamless power delivery across different driving conditions.
The fastest Jeep Compass variant accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds, with a top speed capped at 200 km/h. These figures make it a capable SUV for urban and countryside exploits alike.
Mazda’s CX-60 edges ahead, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in a quick 5.8 seconds, and topping speeds at a notable 219 km/h. It stands as a great testament to Mazda's commitment to performance without compromising efficiency.
Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers but differ in storage capacity. The Jeep Compass offers a trunk capacity of up to 438 liters, while the Mazda CX-60 wins the cargo battle with a spacious 570 liters, perfect for those weekend getaways.
The CX-60's added weight from its robust design and features does not deter its performance, offering options like a 500 Nm torque that translates into powerful driving and towing capabilities.
The Jeep Compass comes in CO2 efficiency classes D and B, with emissions ranging between 123 to 48 g/km, particularly excelling in its Plugin Hybrid mode. Its electric range of 36 km is advantageous for short, local drives.
The Mazda CX-60 aims to keep emissions low, achieving CO2 efficiency classes B and D, along with an impressive electric range of 64 km. With CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km, it takes a significant stride towards a sustainable future.
Both SUVs have carved their niches with unique offerings. The Jeep Compass embodies versatility and trusted off-road legacy, while the Mazda CX-60 redefines expectations in its category with cutting-edge technology and impressive efficiency. Choosing between these two ultimately boils down to personal preference: the adventurous heart of the Jeep Compass or the dynamic innovation of the Mazda CX-60. Both models promise a thrilling driving experience, proving the 2024 SUV lineup to be one for the books.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jeep Compass is markedly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,471 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers clearly more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 437 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is slightly lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 223 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers barely more boot space – 570 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries clearly more – 612 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.
The Jeep Compass sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España