Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Jeep Compass or Mazda CX-60 fits your lifestyle better.
In the world of compact SUVs, two standout models are turning heads in 2024: the Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-60. Both vehicles offer a blend of style and innovation, each catering to the adventurous spirit of modern drivers. Let's dive into an in-depth comparison to see how they stack up against each other.
The 2024 Jeep Compass offers a choice between Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (MHEV) and Plugin Hybrid engines. With power outputs ranging from 130 to 240 HP, it's suitable for varied driving preferences. The Compass provides a balanced consumption of 5.5 L/100km in its MHEV variant to an extremely efficient 2 L/100km in the Plugin Hybrid.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 delivers powerful Plugin Hybrid and Diesel MHEV engine options, reaching up to 327 HP. The CX-60 boasts an impressive efficiency, with a Plugin Hybrid consumption rate of just 1.4 L/100km, making it a strong contender for eco-conscious drivers seeking performance.
Jeep Compass offers both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive options across its variants, adopting a versatility suitable for any terrain. The dual-clutch automatic and automatic gearbox options make for smooth transitions and responsive handling.
Mazda CX-60 makes a bold statement with its Rear-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive selections, merging driving dynamics with the confidence of classic SUV speed and control. Its automatic gearbox ensures seamless power delivery across different driving conditions.
The fastest Jeep Compass variant accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds, with a top speed capped at 200 km/h. These figures make it a capable SUV for urban and countryside exploits alike.
Mazda’s CX-60 edges ahead, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in a quick 5.8 seconds, and topping speeds at a notable 219 km/h. It stands as a great testament to Mazda's commitment to performance without compromising efficiency.
Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers but differ in storage capacity. The Jeep Compass offers a trunk capacity of up to 438 liters, while the Mazda CX-60 wins the cargo battle with a spacious 570 liters, perfect for those weekend getaways.
The CX-60's added weight from its robust design and features does not deter its performance, offering options like a 500 Nm torque that translates into powerful driving and towing capabilities.
The Jeep Compass comes in CO2 efficiency classes D and B, with emissions ranging between 123 to 48 g/km, particularly excelling in its Plugin Hybrid mode. Its electric range of 36 km is advantageous for short, local drives.
The Mazda CX-60 aims to keep emissions low, achieving CO2 efficiency classes B and D, along with an impressive electric range of 64 km. With CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km, it takes a significant stride towards a sustainable future.
Both SUVs have carved their niches with unique offerings. The Jeep Compass embodies versatility and trusted off-road legacy, while the Mazda CX-60 redefines expectations in its category with cutting-edge technology and impressive efficiency. Choosing between these two ultimately boils down to personal preference: the adventurous heart of the Jeep Compass or the dynamic innovation of the Mazda CX-60. Both models promise a thrilling driving experience, proving the 2024 SUV lineup to be one for the books.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 7705 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 5.80 L. The difference is about 4.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Jeep Compass performs decisively better – achieving up to 500 km, about 436 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs somewhat better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls distinct stronger with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Compass is to a small extent lighter – 1667 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 223 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers hardly perceptible more room – 570 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1726 L, which is about 165 L more than the Jeep Compass.
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 43200 £
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.8 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
500 km
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4552 mm
|
Length
4745 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1675 mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España