Kia VS MINI

VS

In the electrifying battle of compact crossovers, the Kia EV3 takes on the MINI Aceman, showcasing their distinct personalities and driving experiences. The EV3 impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, offering drivers a blend of practicality and modern features. Meanwhile, the Aceman stands out with its bold design and spirited handling, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside performance.

Kia

details

MINI

details

The rise of electric vehicles marks a significant shift in the automotive landscape, bringing a fresh wave of competition among manufacturers. Among the exciting contenders in the EV sector for 2024 are the Kia EV3 and the MINI Aceman. Both vehicles offer unique features and innovations suited to different audiences. In this comparison, we'll delve into their technical specifications, innovative aspects, and performance to see which model truly stands out.

Design and Dimensions

Starting with design, the Kia EV3 presents a robust and modern SUV silhouette, measuring approximately 4300 mm in length, 1850 mm in width, and standing at 1560 mm high, with five doors for easy access. In contrast, the MINI Aceman sports a more compact form, stretching 4079 mm in length and 1754 mm in width, but slightly shorter at 1514 mm in height, also featuring five doors. Both vehicles are designed for urban agility while maintaining their distinct styling cues—Kia's bold lines against MINI's iconic cheeky curves.

Powertrain and Performance

Under the hood, the Kia EV3 is equipped with a front-wheel-drive electric powertrain, generating an impressive 204 HP and a strong torque of 283 Nm. It offers three battery capacity options: 58.3 kWh, providing an electric range of up to 436 km, or the larger 81.4 kWh version offering an extended range of 605 km on a single charge. The EV3 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in just 7.5 seconds and reach a maximum speed of 170 km/h.

The MINI Aceman, on the other hand, showcases a slightly diverse performance range with up to 258 HP and torque peaking at 350 Nm, depending on the variant. Its battery options include 38.5 kWh and 49.2 kWh capacities, with the range varying from 309 km to 405 km. The Aceman boasts a quicker acceleration time of 6.4 seconds in its top trim and shares the same automatic transmission type featuring a reduction gearbox as seen in the Kia. The maximum speed reaches up to 200 km/h in its highest performance version, making it the sportier choice between the two.

Energy Consumption and Efficiency

In terms of energy efficiency, the Kia EV3’s consumption stands at 14.9 to 16.2 kWh/100 km, slightly higher than the MINI Aceman's 14.0 to 16.0 kWh/100 km. Both vehicles fall within the CO2 efficiency class A, highlighting their eco-friendly credentials. The lower energy consumption of the Aceman can be a significant factor for potential buyers conscious of electricity usage.

Interior and Comfort

When it comes to interior features, the Kia EV3 offers a spacious cabin focused on comfort and technology, with a trunk capacity of 460 liters, ensuring ample space for family outings or shopping trips. The five-seat configuration is practical for families. In contrast, the MINI Aceman, while offering a cozy and stylish interior, provides a smaller trunk of 300 liters, which may appeal more to urban dwellers looking for a fun and dynamic driving experience rather than raw practicality.

Innovative Features

Both vehicles come brimming with technology. The Kia EV3 integrates modern infotainment systems, advanced safety features like adaptive cruise control, and smart connectivity options, catering to tech-savvy consumers. Meanwhile, the MINI Aceman leans into its heritage with a unique take on smart driving assistance systems while emphasizing driver engagement and an agile driving experience that MINI is known for.

Conclusion: Which EV Reigns Supreme?

In conclusion, the choice between the Kia EV3 and the MINI Aceman ultimately boils down to personal preferences and driving needs. The Kia EV3 stands out with its extended range, larger cargo space, and strong performance, making it ideal for practical buyers seeking comfort on longer journeys. On the other hand, the MINI Aceman shines with its sporty performance metrics and urban-centric design, catering to those who prioritize efficiency and a fun driving experience.

As the electric vehicle market continues to grow, both models represent the manufacturers' commitment to innovation and sustainability, each carving out its distinct space in a rapidly evolving automotive world.

Kia
MINI

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 30800 - 41700 £
Price
about 29900 - 41000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
Electric Range
436 - 605 km
Electric Range
309 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
58.3 - 81.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
3
Curb weight
1800 - 1885 kg
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
Trunk capacity
460 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
4300 - 4310 mm
Length
4079 mm
Width
1850 mm
Width
1754 mm
Height
1560 - 1570 mm
Height
1514 mm
Payload
470 kg
Payload
450 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
170 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
283 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-
Top speed
170 km/h
Top speed
160 - 200 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Kia
Brand
MINI

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.