VS

Kia Niro vs Vauxhall Mokka comparison

Compare performance (138 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 23,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Vauxhall Mokka?

Kia Niro vs Vauxhall Mokka: Key differences

Kia Niro

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient

Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Vauxhall Mokka is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Niro uses 4.5 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Vauxhall Mokka with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Mokka

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Mokka offers substantially more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Mokka delivers clearly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Niro

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Mokka is slightly lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries somewhat more – 466 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Mokka holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,000
Mokka

Vauxhall Mokka

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 336 - 403 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Frontera is a rugged, old-school SUV that trades creature comforts for go-anywhere attitude—perfect for buyers after analogue charm, simple mechanics and mud under the wheel arches. The Opel Mokka is the polished city slicker: compact, efficient and loaded with modern tech and safety …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Kia Niro
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Niro

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08
Kia_Niro_HEV_24
Kia_Niro_HEV_22
Kia_Niro_HEV_05
Kia_Niro_HEV_13

Reviews Kia Niro

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Archi
25 Mar 2026, 13:11:41

Efficient, functional, understated, spacious and comfortable. No surprises: it delivers what it promises and does its job without fanfare. Good buy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Wolfgang Schäfer
21 Oct 2025, 14:01:32

I've been driving the Kia Niro since 2019 and am still very happy with this car.

Vauxhall Mokka

The Opel Mokka cuts a smart, modern silhouette that feels right at home in the city while still turning heads on the open road. It's a practical, easy-to-live-with crossover that blends comfy driving manners with enough flair and tech to keep daily commutes interesting — and it won’t make you regret trading up.

details
001_Opel-Mokka-512749
006_Opel-Mokka-512753
005_Opel-Mokka-512752
015_Opel-Mokka-512759
011_Opel-Mokka-513096

Reviews Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Opel Corsa
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Corsa is the cheeky city hatch that zips into parking spaces and pockets with equal ease, while the Opel Mokka trades that nimble charm for SUV attitude, a higher driving position and a few extra inches of boot space. If you want affordable fun and frugal running costs, pick the Corsa; if …
Opel Mokka
Renault Captur
VS
The Opel Mokka prowls the urban jungle with bold styling and surprisingly sharp handling that makes it feel like a grown-up compact SUV, while the Renault Captur plays the sensible diplomat with a softer ride, clever cabin tricks and a friendlier fuel bill. Pick the Mokka if you want punchy driver …
Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
It's the compact-crossover face-off that asks whether you crave wallet-friendly efficiency or a bit more personality: the Kia Niro goes toe-to-toe with the Kia XCeed. One is all about hybrid thrift and everyday practicality; the other flirts with sharper styling and a livelier drive — both sensible …
Opel Grandland
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Grandland feels like the sensible grown-up in the family — roomy, softly suspended and better suited to long journeys or a big grocery run, while the Opel Mokka is the cheeky urbanite: compact, bold-looking and blissfully easy to park. Pick the Grandland for space and comfort, the Mokka if …
Opel Astra
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Astra is the grown-up compact — practical, composed and roomy enough for weekend gear, while the Opel Mokka trades boot space for a higher driving position, sharper looks and crossover sass. Pick the Astra for better value, comfort and lower running costs; choose the Mokka if you crave …
Kia Niro
Kia Stonic
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro and Kia Stonic each bring their own unique strengths to the table. The Niro impresses with its hybrid efficiency and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Stonic stands out with its sporty design and …
Kia Niro
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their distinct advantages. The Kia Niro impresses with its hybrid and all-electric options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and eco-friendly performance, making it an ideal choice for environmentally …
Opel Mokka
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Opel Mokka stands out with its striking design and tech-savvy interior, offering a premium feel that appeals to modern drivers. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona impresses with its sporty performance and practicality, making it a top choice for those who …
Kia Niro
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
co2
102 - 111 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
44 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,474 kg
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
4,150 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,787 mm
Height
-
Height
1,515 - 1,535 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,060 - 1,105 L
Payload
466 kg
Payload
388 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 HP
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
150 - 209 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
102 kW
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
Brand
Kia
Brand
Vauxhall
What drive types are available for the Kia Niro?

The Kia Niro is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.