In a head-to-head comparison, the Opel Mokka and the Peugeot 2008 showcase distinct personalities and design philosophies within the compact SUV segment. While the Mokka impresses with its bold styling and advanced tech features, the Peugeot 2008 offers a more refined interior and a dynamic driving experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two rivals comes down to personal preference, as both models deliver solid performance and practicality for urban and suburban drivers alike.
As the compact SUV market continues to expand, the Opel Mokka and Peugeot 2008 stand out as two strong contenders, each offering unique features and innovations. Both vehicles cater to a modern audience seeking an amalgamation of style, practicality, and technology. This article will delve into a comprehensive comparison of the two models, analyzing their technical aspects and innovations.
First impressions matter, and both the Opel Mokka and Peugeot 2008 deliver a striking aesthetic appeal. The Opel Mokka measures 4150 mm in length, 1787 mm in width, and 1535 mm in height, showcasing a compact and sporty silhouette. On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008 is slightly longer at 4304 mm, with a width of 1770 mm and a height of 1523 mm, giving it a more robust appearance.
When it comes to cargo space, the Peugeot 2008 edges ahead with a trunk capacity of 434 liters compared to the Mokka's 350 liters, making it a more practical choice for those who prioritize storage.
Under the hood, both vehicles offer a variety of powertrains. The Mokka features a range of engine choices including petrol, petrol MHEV, and electric variants, with power outputs ranging from 130 HP to 156 HP. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 also provides petrol, petrol MHEV, and electric options, with outputs comparable to the Mokka, peaking at 156 HP.
Acceleration is another critical differentiator. The Mokka impresses with a 0-100 km/h time as low as 9.0 seconds, while the 2008 offers a commendable time of 8.3 seconds for its sprightliest variant. This showcases the Peugeot's potential for a sportier performance feel.
Fuel consumption is an essential consideration for many buyers. The Mokka offers varied consumption rates, with figures as low as 4.8 L/100 km for its electric variant, while the petrol engines hover around 6.1 to 6.2 L/100 km. In comparison, the 2008 stands out with an average fuel consumption of about 5.0 L/100 km across its petrol variants, with a maximum electric range of 406 km, slightly edging out the Mokka’s electric range of up to 403 km.
In the realm of technology and innovations, both models equip drivers with advanced features. The Opel Mokka embraces modern design with a digital cockpit, offering a more immersive driving experience through customizable displays and connectivity options. The vehicle’s latest infotainment system integrates seamlessly with smartphones, enhancing usability and accessibility.
Similarly, the Peugeot 2008 boasts an impressive array of tech features, including a well-designed i-Cockpit layout that prioritizes driver interaction. Its infotainment system also supports smartphone integration and includes advanced driver assistance systems for added safety.
When it comes to driving dynamics, the Opel Mokka offers a nimble ride, benefiting from a well-tuned suspension that strikes a balance between comfort and sportiness. The front-wheel drive system enhances traction, making it a reliable companion in diverse driving conditions.
The Peugeot 2008, known for its agile handling, provides a similar driving experience with a focus on comfort. The vehicle’s design and engineering prioritize a smooth ride, making it suitable for both city commuting and longer journeys.
In summary, both the Opel Mokka and Peugeot 2008 present compelling options in the compact SUV market. The Mokka offers a slightly larger body and strong performance metrics, while the 2008 impresses with its superior fuel efficiency, trunk space, and driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two will largely depend on individual preferences related to design, technology, and driving experience. As the popularity of compact SUVs continues to rise, both models remain pivotal in defining the future of mobility within the segment.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 22900 - 33400
£
|
Price
about 23200 - 38200
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.2
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 15.9
kWh
|
Electric Range
402 - 403
km
|
Electric Range
343 - 406
km
|
Battery Capacity
51
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51
kWh
|
co2
137, 139, 127, 128, 108, 0
g/km
|
co2
113, 129, 0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
44
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1294 - 1615
kg
|
Curb weight
1263 - 1623
kg
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 350
L
|
Trunk capacity
434
L
|
Length
4150
mm
|
Length
4304
mm
|
Width
1787
mm
|
Width
1770
mm
|
Height
1535
mm
|
Height
1523
mm
|
Payload
388 - 400
kg
|
Payload
407 - 447
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
130 - 156
HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.2
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9
s
|
Max Speed
150 - 207
km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 206
km/h
|
Torque
230 - 260
Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Power kW
96 - 115
kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115
kW
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Top speed
150 - 207
km/h
|
Top speed
150 - 206
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, C, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, A
|
Brand
Opel
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.