Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Skoda Octavia Combi?
The automotive market is brimming with choices, but few models stand out for their blend of practicality, efficiency, and features. Today, we delve into a comparison between the Kia Niro and the Skoda Octavia Combi, focusing on their technical specifications, innovations, and what makes each vehicle unique.
The Kia Niro, an SUV model available in both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, is designed for those seeking a green driving experience combined with the practicality of an SUV. Its streamlined body makes it attractive, while its enhanced fuel efficiency appeals to eco-conscious drivers.
The Niro integrates advanced technology such as regenerative braking and a comprehensive infotainment system that includes smartphone connectivity. Furthermore, it features a CO2 emissions class of C, reflecting its commitment to sustainability.
The Skoda Octavia Combi is a versatile wagon that shines in the practicality department. Known for its spacious interior and premium features, it is aimed at families and professionals who need a reliable vehicle with good performance.
The Octavia features modern innovations like adaptive cruise control and a digital cockpit, enhancing both safety and driving experience. Its CO2 emissions range from D to C, showcasing the various engine efficiencies available.
When comparing the Kia Niro and Skoda Octavia Combi, the key difference lies in their target audience and practicality. The Niro's hybrid options cater to environmentally inclined drivers looking for an SUV experience, while the Octavia Combi provides larger cargo space and more engine variants for those needing versatility without sacrificing performance.
Ultimately, both the Kia Niro and Skoda Octavia Combi offer unique advantages. The Niro excels in eco-friendliness and compact SUV styling, making it ideal for urban dwellers. In contrast, the Octavia Combi's spacious interior and powerful engine choices cater to families and those with more demanding transport needs. Your choice will depend on your specific driving requirements and lifestyle.
Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Octavia Combi has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.40 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi has a distinct edge – offering 265 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 85 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Kia Niro tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 65 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Combi pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 370 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, the Skoda Octavia Combi is minimal lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers distinct more room – 640 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 189 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs a bit better – up to 1700 L, which is about 255 L more than the Kia Niro.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Octavia Combi somewhat takes the win – 534 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.
Our conclusion: The Skoda Octavia Combi proves to be leaves the rival little chance and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, Skoda Octavia Combi is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Kia Niro presents itself as a versatile and eco-friendly SUV, blending a stylish design with advanced hybrid technology. Its spacious interior offers comfort and practicality, making it ideal for both city driving and longer journeys. With a focus on efficiency and sustainability, the Niro is a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers.
detailsThe Skoda Octavia Wagon impresses with its spacious interior, offering ample room for both passengers and luggage. It maintains a sleek and modern design, making it a stylish choice for families and professionals alike. The vehicle boasts an efficient engine range, providing a smooth and responsive driving experience.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
24400 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1366 - 1534 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.