VS

Kia Niro vs Suzuki Across – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Suzuki Across?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro @ press.kia.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia Niro has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Suzuki Across costs 49900 £. That’s a price difference of around 20743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Across manages with 1 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Kia Niro with 2.40 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Suzuki Across performs somewhat better – achieving up to 75 km, about 13 km more than the Kia Niro.

Across @ Suzuki

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Across has a significantly edge – offering 306 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 126 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Across is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs minimal better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Suzuki Across tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

Niro @ press.kia.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Niro is clearly lighter – 1474 kg compared to 2075 kg. The difference is around 601 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Suzuki Across offers barely noticeable more room – 490 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Suzuki Across performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1604 L, which is about 159 L more than the Kia Niro.

When it comes to payload, Kia Niro minimal takes the win – 466 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Suzuki Across proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Suzuki Across is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

about £49,877
Across_überarbeitet_1

Suzuki Across

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1 L
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details

Kia Niro

5 (1)
rate

The Kia Niro presents itself as a versatile and eco-friendly SUV, blending a stylish design with advanced hybrid technology. Its spacious interior offers comfort and practicality, making it ideal for both city driving and longer journeys. With a focus on efficiency and sustainability, the Niro is a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_24 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_22 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_05 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Niro_HEV_13 @ press.kia.com

Suzuki Across

5 (1)
rate

The Suzuki Across presents itself as a robust SUV with an emphasis on efficiency and versatility. Its design merges bold styling with practical features, making it suitable for both urban environments and off-road adventures. Inside, drivers will find a comfortable and well-equipped cabin, designed to enhance the driving experience with modern technology and ample space.

details
Across_überarbeitet_1 @ Suzuki
Across_überarbeitet_4 @ Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; if you want style, a bit of fun and a nicer interior, the T‑Roc is the one to tempt you.
Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for those seeking a more dynamic experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two Kia models comes down to personal preference, with each catering to different lifestyle needs.
Kia Niro
Suzuki Across
Niro
Across

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 38600 £
Price
49900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
53 - 111 g/km
co2
22 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Curb weight
2075 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Trunk capacity
490 L
Length
4420 mm
Length
4635 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1545 mm
Height
1690 mm
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
Max trunk capacity
1604 L
Payload
466 kg
Payload
435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 s
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
2487 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Kia
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
Lexus LBX
VS
In the latest showdown between the Kia Niro and the Lexus LBX, both compact SUVs deliver distinctive attributes tailored to different types of drivers. The Kia Niro offers a practical and economical choice with its hybrid technology, making it ideal for environmentally conscious buyers who prioritize fuel efficiency and space. Meanwhile, the Lexus LBX stands out with its luxurious interior feel and advanced technology, catering to those who value a premium driving experience and a more refined aesthetic.
Kia EV3
Kia Niro
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the Kia EV3 stands out with its futuristic design and impressive range, appealing to tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Kia Niro offers a balanced blend of practicality and efficiency, making it a strong contender for families looking for a versatile hybrid option. Both models showcase Kia's commitment to sustainability, but prospective buyers will need to consider their unique needs and driving styles to choose the right fit.
Kia Niro
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their distinct advantages. The Kia Niro impresses with its hybrid and all-electric options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and eco-friendly performance, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq offers a robust yet comfortable drive with a well-appointed interior, catering to those who prioritize practicality and style in urban settings.
Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Suzuki Across and Toyota RAV4 share a striking resemblance in design and performance, given their close relationship as part of the same platform. While both models offer impressive hybrid efficiency, the Suzuki Across distinguishes itself with a unique set of features and a slightly sportier driving experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two may come down to brand loyalty and specific preference in styling and infotainment systems.
Honda HR-V
Kia Niro
VS
In the compact SUV arena, the Honda HR-V impresses with its spacious interior, sleek design, and reliable performance, making it a favorite for urban adventurers. Meanwhile, the Kia Niro stands out with its eco-friendly hybrid and electric options, providing a green alternative without sacrificing style and comfort. Both vehicles offer advanced technology features, but the choice ultimately depends on whether your priority is fuel efficiency or roomy practicality.
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Niro
VS
In a thrilling showdown between the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Niro, both cars showcase impressive practicality and modern design, appealing to urban drivers seeking versatility. The Bayon impresses with its bold aesthetics and spacious interior, while the Niro stands out for its eco-friendly hybrid options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models comes down to personal preference, as they both deliver excellent performance and comfort in their respective segments.
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR present compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers seeking a stylish and efficient crossover. The Niro, with its hybrid and electric options, emphasizes fuel economy and a spacious interior, making it ideal for families or those with cargo needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR offers a more dynamic exterior design, appealing to those who prioritize a bold aesthetic alongside a spirited driving experience.
Kia Niro
Kia Stonic
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro and Kia Stonic each bring their own unique strengths to the table. The Niro impresses with its hybrid efficiency and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Stonic stands out with its sporty design and agile handling, appealing to those seeking a more engaging driving experience.
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.