Compare performance (68 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (15,100 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Picanto or Nissan Interstar?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia Picanto is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,100 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,082 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Picanto uses 5.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers substantially more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 68 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers significantly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 96 Nm. That’s about 284 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Kia Picanto offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Picanto is clearly lighter – 1,124 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 929 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries substantially more – 1,447 kg compared to 332 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,115 kg.
The Nissan Interstar stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia Picanto is a cheeky city hatch that squeezes surprising style, practicality and a smile-inducing drive into a pocket-friendly package. It’s ideal for urban buyers who want fuss-free running, effortless parking and a car that punches above its class without pretending to be anything it’s not.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,100 - 19,500 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 134 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,124 - 1,131 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
255 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,595 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
253 - 332 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
68 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.6 - 17.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
96 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
50 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Nissan
|