VS

Kia Stonic vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (115 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (20,400 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or Nissan Qashqai?

Kia Stonic vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Stonic

Introduction: The Compact SUV Showdown

The compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, offering the perfect balance of utility and style for urban and rural lifestyles alike. This comparison pits two strong contenders against each other: the Kia Stonic and the Nissan Qashqai. Both vehicles offer unique strengths, innovations, and specifications that appeal to a wide range of drivers. Let's delve into the details of these vehicles and see how they stack up against each other.

Qashqai

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Stonic, with its sporty and aggressive design, measures 4140mm in length, 1760mm in width, and stands at 1505mm in height. It provides a compact footprint that is agile and easy to maneuver in the city, making it an excellent choice for urban dwellers.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai is larger, boasting a length of 4425mm, a width of 1835mm, and a height of 1625mm. This bigger size grants the Qashqai a more commanding presence on the road, along with increased interior space and cargo capacity.

Stonic

Engine Options and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Kia Stonic offers a choice between petrol and mild-hybrid engines, delivering power outputs ranging from 79 to 100 HP depending on the variant. The vehicle's efficiency is noteworthy, with fuel consumption between 5.5-5.8L/100km and CO2 emissions in the range of 125-132g/km. The Stonic can sprint from 0 to 100km/h in as little as 11.3 seconds.

The Nissan Qashqai, on the other hand, boasts more powerful engine choices with outputs from 140 up to an impressive 190 HP. The Qashqai is available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, catering to a broader audience who may desire enhanced traction and stability. Fuel consumption is slightly higher, around 5.1-6.8L/100km, while CO2 emissions vary between 116-154g/km. The Qashqai excels in acceleration, particularly with its 1.5L option, achieving 0-100km/h in just 7.9 seconds.

Qashqai

Innovative Features and Technology

Both vehicles are equipped with modern technologies designed to improve safety and enhance the driving experience. The Kia Stonic features a suite of driver-assistance systems, including lane-keeping assist, automated emergency braking, and a user-friendly infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones.

The Nissan Qashqai, not to be outdone, introduces a comprehensive Safety Shield 360 technology package, which includes features such as blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. Additionally, its advanced ProPILOT Assist system offers a semi-autonomous driving experience, making highway driving more relaxed and enjoyable.

Stonic

Interior Space and Comfort

Inside, the Kia Stonic accommodates five passengers comfortably, with a trunk capacity of 352 liters, adequate for weekend getaways and daily commutes. The cabin design emphasizes functionality and style, combining modern aesthetics with practicality.

The Nissan Qashqai, in contrast, offers more generous interior space, accommodating five passengers with ease and providing a larger trunk capacity of 504 liters. The more spacious environment, combined with quality materials and an ergonomic design, ensures that both drivers and passengers enjoy comfort during longer journeys.

Qashqai

Conclusion: Which Compact SUV is Right for You?

The Kia Stonic presents an appealing option for those seeking a compact SUV that combines efficient performance with a sporty design. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai emerges as a more powerful and spacious option with advanced technology and impressive practicality.

In summary, the choice between the Kia Stonic and the Nissan Qashqai ultimately depends on your personal preferences and driving needs. Whether you prioritize agility and city handling or seek a multi-functional family vehicle, both SUVs stand as commendable choices in the ever-competitive compact SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Stonic is significantly cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,214 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers substantially more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers visibly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is a bit lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers markedly more boot space – 504 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 152 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries somewhat more – 516 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Qashqai is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 158 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details
Kia Stonic
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

details
Kia_Stonic_MY22_04
Kia_Stonic_MY22_16
Kia_Stonic_MY22_15
Kia_Stonic_MY22_08
Kia_Stonic_MJ22_05

Reviews Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jan
18 Mar 2026, 07:19:10

Very good car, uses little fuel, nothing's gone wrong in 4 years, no breakdowns.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ennio
4 Feb 2026, 13:19:36

I'm very satisfied — I have a Stonic Black Edition hybrid, and I haven't had any problems after two years.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details
13. New refreshed Qashqai 2024 in fuji sunset color driving on the road in Faro, Portugal
3. New refreshed Qashqai 2024 in fuji sunset color driving on the road in Faro, Portugal
9-High
All-New Nissan Qashqai - Interior 32

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
karol
3 Jun 2026, 20:17:58

Great car — it has everything you need. Others are still learning, e.g. folding mirrors, a double trunk, and it's well soundproofed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Honda HR-V
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Choosing between the Honda HR‑V and the Nissan Qashqai comes down to how you balance practical space, fuel economy and driving refinement. The HR‑V shines for clever interior packaging and city-friendly practicality, while the Qashqai prioritizes comfort, tech features and a more composed on-road …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the grown-up choice — roomier, more composed on the motorway and better suited to families who need practicality without fuss. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the cheeky city-smart alternative: nippier, easier to park and blessed with Toyota’s hybrid know-how, perfect if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
SEAT Arona
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and the SEAT Arona comes down to whether you want a more spacious, refined compact SUV (Qashqai) or a smaller, city‑friendly crossover that prioritises agility and value (Arona). I’ll run through the key differences in space, driving feel, engines, equipment and …
Nissan Qashqai
MG HS
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the MG HS helps you decide between a well-proven, refined compact SUV and a value-packed alternative with strong equipment levels. The Qashqai emphasises ride comfort, build quality and established resale while the MG HS offers more kit for the money, a generous …
Kia Stonic
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 128 g/km
co2
98 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Trunk capacity
352 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,760 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
440 - 445 kg
Payload
446 - 516 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Nissan
Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.