VS

Kia Stonic vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (115 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (20,100 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or Nissan Qashqai?

Kia Stonic vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Stonic

Introduction: The Compact SUV Showdown

The compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, offering the perfect balance of utility and style for urban and rural lifestyles alike. This comparison pits two strong contenders against each other: the Kia Stonic and the Nissan Qashqai. Both vehicles offer unique strengths, innovations, and specifications that appeal to a wide range of drivers. Let's delve into the details of these vehicles and see how they stack up against each other.

Qashqai

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Stonic, with its sporty and aggressive design, measures 4140mm in length, 1760mm in width, and stands at 1505mm in height. It provides a compact footprint that is agile and easy to maneuver in the city, making it an excellent choice for urban dwellers.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai is larger, boasting a length of 4425mm, a width of 1835mm, and a height of 1625mm. This bigger size grants the Qashqai a more commanding presence on the road, along with increased interior space and cargo capacity.

Stonic

Engine Options and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Kia Stonic offers a choice between petrol and mild-hybrid engines, delivering power outputs ranging from 79 to 100 HP depending on the variant. The vehicle's efficiency is noteworthy, with fuel consumption between 5.5-5.8L/100km and CO2 emissions in the range of 125-132g/km. The Stonic can sprint from 0 to 100km/h in as little as 11.3 seconds.

The Nissan Qashqai, on the other hand, boasts more powerful engine choices with outputs from 140 up to an impressive 190 HP. The Qashqai is available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, catering to a broader audience who may desire enhanced traction and stability. Fuel consumption is slightly higher, around 5.1-6.8L/100km, while CO2 emissions vary between 116-154g/km. The Qashqai excels in acceleration, particularly with its 1.5L option, achieving 0-100km/h in just 7.9 seconds.

Qashqai

Innovative Features and Technology

Both vehicles are equipped with modern technologies designed to improve safety and enhance the driving experience. The Kia Stonic features a suite of driver-assistance systems, including lane-keeping assist, automated emergency braking, and a user-friendly infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones.

The Nissan Qashqai, not to be outdone, introduces a comprehensive Safety Shield 360 technology package, which includes features such as blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. Additionally, its advanced ProPILOT Assist system offers a semi-autonomous driving experience, making highway driving more relaxed and enjoyable.

Stonic

Interior Space and Comfort

Inside, the Kia Stonic accommodates five passengers comfortably, with a trunk capacity of 352 liters, adequate for weekend getaways and daily commutes. The cabin design emphasizes functionality and style, combining modern aesthetics with practicality.

The Nissan Qashqai, in contrast, offers more generous interior space, accommodating five passengers with ease and providing a larger trunk capacity of 504 liters. The more spacious environment, combined with quality materials and an ergonomic design, ensures that both drivers and passengers enjoy comfort during longer journeys.

Qashqai

Conclusion: Which Compact SUV is Right for You?

The Kia Stonic presents an appealing option for those seeking a compact SUV that combines efficient performance with a sporty design. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai emerges as a more powerful and spacious option with advanced technology and impressive practicality.

In summary, the choice between the Kia Stonic and the Nissan Qashqai ultimately depends on your personal preferences and driving needs. Whether you prioritize agility and city handling or seek a multi-functional family vehicle, both SUVs stand as commendable choices in the ever-competitive compact SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Stonic is significantly cheaper – starting at 20,100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,471 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.5 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers substantially more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Nissan Qashqai is somewhat faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 182 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers visibly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is a bit lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers markedly more boot space – 504 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 152 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,447 L, about 292 L more than the Kia Stonic.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries somewhat more – 520 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Qashqai is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
Kia Stonic
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.

details

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details
Kia Stonic
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

Price
20,100 - 26,600 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 133 g/km
co2
102 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
Trunk capacity
352 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
4,165 mm
Length
4,425 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
1,520 mm
Height
1,625 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
Payload
440 - 445 kg
Payload
466 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
Max Speed
179 - 182 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.