Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

What drivetrain options does the Suzuki Swift have?

The Suzuki Swift is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Suzuki Swift deliver on the road?

Up to 82 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Suzuki Swift in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.40 L.

What maximum speed does the Suzuki Swift reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 170 km/h.

How big is the Suzuki Swift overall?

Overall, the Suzuki Swift is 3860 mm long, 1735 mm wide and 1485 mm high.

Kia XCeed vs Suzuki Swift - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swift has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17100 £, while the Kia XCeed costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 5992 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Swift manages with 4.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.

Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a convincingly edge – offering 180 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 98 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia XCeed pulls decisively stronger with 265 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 153 Nm difference.

XCeed @ Kia Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is distinct lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 282 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia XCeed offers evident more room – 426 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia XCeed performs distinct better – up to 1378 L, which is about 398 L more than the Suzuki Swift.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed distinct takes the win – 479 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 183 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Kia XCeed proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Kia XCeed is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Suzuki Swift

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai i10

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Suzuki Swift

VS

The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Suzuki Swift

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Aygo

VS

If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 - 33000 £	Price 17100 - 21200 £
Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 144 - 155 g/km	co2 98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity 37 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg	Curb weight 1069 - 1145 kg
Trunk capacity 426 L	Trunk capacity 265 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 3860 mm
Width 1826 mm	Width 1735 mm
Height 1483 - 1495 mm	Height 1485 - 1510 mm
Max trunk capacity 1378 L	Max trunk capacity 980 L
Payload 471 - 479 kg	Payload 282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 180 HP	Power HP 82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h -
Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 160 - 170 km/h
Torque 200 - 265 Nm	Torque 112 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 85 - 132 kW	Power kW 61 kW
Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1197 cm3