Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs MG HS comparison
Compare performance (269 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (43,300 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or MG HS?
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs MG HS: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG HS is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,294 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the MG HS offers clearly more range – reaching up to 100 km, about 33 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
HS
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG HS offers marginally more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers visibly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.
Range Rover Evoque
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG HS is marginally lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 57 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MG HS offers very slightly more boot space – 507 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries clearly more – 600 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MG HS holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,000
MG HS
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
MG HS
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
MG HS
The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
MG HS
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
Electric Range
100 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
co2
14 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Payload
400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
MG
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.